The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: use the mount idmap for the owner check in fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy()
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 21:34:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726043406.GA1708@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725080004.929328-1-zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>

[+Cc linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 04:00:04PM +0800, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> 
> fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() calls inode_owner_or_capable() with
> &nop_mnt_idmap before allowing an encryption policy to be set, instead of
> the idmap of the mount the ioctl was issued on.
> 
> fscrypt is used by filesystems that support idmapped mounts (e.g. ext4,
> f2fs), so on such a mount this compares the caller's fsuid against the
> unmapped on-disk owner rather than the mapped owner: the actual owner can
> be wrongly denied with -EACCES and an unrelated caller wrongly allowed.
> Use file_mnt_idmap(filp) instead.
> 
> Fixes: 01beba7957a2 ("fs: port inode_owner_or_capable() to mnt_idmap")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/crypto/policy.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/policy.c b/fs/crypto/policy.c
> index 9915e39362db..c80b24a941ad 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
> +++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp, const void __user *arg)
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	policy.version = version;
>  
> -	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(&nop_mnt_idmap, inode))
> +	if (!inode_owner_or_capable(file_mnt_idmap(filp), inode))
>  		return -EACCES;
>  
>  	ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Thanks.  I don't think the Fixes commit is quite right: 01beba7957a2
seems to have been a behavior-preserving commit.  It even says that it
was "eliminating the possibility of any bugs" :-)

Really it seems a patch to this function was just missing entirely, but
I would probably use 14f3db5542e6 ("ext4: support idmapped mounts").
That's when the other ext4 ioctls got converted to use
file_mnt_user_ns() and the idmap support was enabled on ext4, but this
was missed.  (And ext4 was the first fscrypt-capable filesystem to get
idmap support.)  As usual, this also needs 'Cc stable'.

I guess I'll plan to take this through the fscrypt tree.  I'll update
the tags when committing if there's no other feedback.

- Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-26  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-25  8:00 [PATCH] fscrypt: use the mount idmap for the owner check in fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() Zhan Xusheng
2026-07-26  4:34 ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260726043406.GA1708@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox