The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] s390/crypto: Replace cond_resched() with schedule()
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:24:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727162430.1599396-2-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727162430.1599396-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>

The comment for all cond_resched() calls in crypto code says that the
process should be scheduled away to avoid instant re-invocation of a
callback. This is not what cond_resched() would do or did.

Replace cond_resched() with a call to schedule() which comes closer, but
it looks more like this code wants an msleep() call.

Note that with [1] cond_resched() is always compiled away and becomes a
no-op.

[1] commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes")

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c  | 8 ++++----
 arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
index 8cfe6166c193..d02de945f864 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int ecb_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
 		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
 		 */
-		cond_resched();
+		schedule();
 		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	} else if (rc) {
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int cbc_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
 		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
 		 */
-		cond_resched();
+		schedule();
 		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	} else if (rc) {
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
 		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
 		 */
-		cond_resched();
+		schedule();
 		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	} else if (rc) {
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ static int xts_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 		 * To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
 		 * tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
 		 */
-		cond_resched();
+		schedule();
 		pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	} else if (rc) {
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
index 03ca33ffe6cc..bddfdcee6cb3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static int phmac_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 			 * tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
 			 */
 			pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-			cond_resched();
+			schedule();
 			return -ENOSPC;
 		} else if (rc) {
 			hwh_advance(hwh, rc);
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int phmac_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
 			 * tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
 			 */
 			pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
-			cond_resched();
+			schedule();
 			return -ENOSPC;
 		}
 		break;
-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-27 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-27 16:24 [PATCH 0/4] s390: Remove or replace cond_resched() calls Heiko Carstens
2026-07-27 16:24 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-07-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: s390: Remove " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390/cio: " Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260727162430.1599396-2-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox