From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
David CARLIER <devnexen@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/mm/pat: introcude cpa_lock() and cpa_unlock()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:21:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728142108.GW751831@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728-cpa-fixes-v1-1-2ed2352300b3@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:07:44PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
> The splitting and merging of kernel page table mappings between small and
> large is protected by cpa_lock.
>
> Commit 5fce67641a3e ("x86/mm/pat: Don't gate cpa_lock on
> debug_pagealloc_enabled()") disabled gatig of cpa_lock on
> debug_pagealloc_enabled() to simplify the code presuming that skipping
> the lock when debug_pagealloc_enabled() was an optimization.
>
> However Lorenzo Stoakes notes that:
>
> __kernel_map_pages() can be called from irq context:
>
> < GFP_ATOMIC context >
> kfree() or whatever
> -> ...
> -> __free_pages_prepare()
> -> debug_pagealloc_unmap_pages()
> -> __kernel_map_pages()
> -> __change_page_attr_set_clr()
> -> cpa_lock spins [irqs off]
>
> So you're spin locking in irq context here, which is probably not a
> good idea.
>
> It would be possible to unconditionally use spin_lock_irqsave() and
> spin_unlock_irqrestore() but that would complicate locking rules even
> more.
>
> Restore gating of cpa_lock of debug_pagealloc_enabled(), but instead of
> putting the open-coded condition
>
> if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
>
> before every lock and unlock operation, wrap the condition and the
> locking operation into cpa_lock() and cpa_unlock() helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index b1e780a465b5..4c8922695fd3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,25 @@ static const int cpa_warn_level = CPA_PROTECT;
> * Serialize cpa() using cpa_lock so that we don't allow any other cpu, with
> * stale large tlb entries, to change the page attribute in parallel to some
> * other cpu splitting a large page entry along with changing the attribute.
> + *
> + * When debug_pagealloc_enabled(), page attributes could be changed in atomic
> + * context that would warrant disabling IRQs. But since debug_pagealloc always
> + * uses 4k pages in the direct map there are no races for splits and collapses
> + * and locking can be just skipped altogether.
> */
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpa_lock);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(_cpa_lock);
> +
> +static inline void cpa_lock(void)
> +{
> + if (!debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> + spin_lock(&_cpa_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void cpa_unlock(void)
> +{
> + if (!debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> + spin_unlock(&_cpa_lock);
> +}
There was already a patch merged that removed the shole debug_pagealloc
exception. Is that not better?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 13:07 [PATCH 0/5] x86/mm/pat: CPA fixes Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-28 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/mm/pat: introcude cpa_lock() and cpa_unlock() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-28 13:13 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-28 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-07-28 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2026-07-28 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 14:46 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 14:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-28 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 15:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-28 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 15:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 15:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-28 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 15:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-28 16:01 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/mm/pat: acquire init_mm write lock on collapse to avoid UAF Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/mm/pat: acquire init_mm read lock on attribute change " Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 13:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-28 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/mm/pat: allocate split page tables as kernel page tables Mike Rapoport
2026-07-28 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/mm/pat: fix effective RW computation in lookup_address_in_pgd_attr() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86/mm/pat: CPA fixes Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728142108.GW751831@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox