From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: axelrasmussen@google.com, david@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
kasong@tencent.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, stevensd@chromium.org,
weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, chenridong@xiaomi.com,
zhangbo56@xiaomi.com, wangzicheng@honor.com, lianux.mm@gmail.com,
"Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] mm: mglru: improve scan_folios() exhaustion detection
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:38:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731083843.37811-5-baohua@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731083843.37811-1-baohua@kernel.org>
Commit 16b475d2ac3c ("mm/mglru: avoid reclaim type fall back when
isolation makes no progress") uses scanned == 0 to determine
whether scan_folios() has exhausted a reclaim type. However,
this is not always sufficient. It is possible for scanned > 0,
while the oldest reclaimable generation is exhausted after the
first scan_folios() call.
Add an exhausted output argument to scan_folios() so it can
explicitly report whether the reclaimable lists for the current
type have been exhausted.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0038f33aa318..2e7fef6975b6 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4707,7 +4707,8 @@ static bool isolate_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct sca
static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct scan_control *sc, int type, int tier,
- struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp)
+ struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp,
+ bool *exhausted)
{
int i;
int gen;
@@ -4723,8 +4724,10 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_to_scan > MAX_LRU_BATCH);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(list));
- if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS)
+ if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS) {
+ *exhausted = true;
return 0;
+ }
next_gen:
gen = lru_gen_from_seq(min_seq);
@@ -4785,6 +4788,11 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
scanned, skipped, isolated,
type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+ /*
+ * This scan exhausted the reclaimable lists before reaching the
+ * scan target or accumulating enough isolated folios.
+ */
+ *exhausted = remaining > 0 && isolated < MIN_LRU_BATCH;
*isolatedp = isolated;
return scanned;
}
@@ -4842,12 +4850,12 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
bool single_type = is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness);
int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness);
int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier;
- bool tried = false;
+ bool tried = false, exhausted;
retry:
tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type);
scanned = scan_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc,
- type, tier, list, isolated);
+ type, tier, list, isolated, &exhausted);
total_scanned += scanned;
if (*isolated) {
@@ -4860,7 +4868,7 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
* We are running out of the current reclaim type. Fall back to
* the other type if allowed.
*/
- if (!tried && !scanned && !single_type) {
+ if (!tried && exhausted && !single_type) {
type = !type;
tried = true;
goto retry;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 8:38 [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] mm: mglru: fix swappiness behavior Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-07-31 8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] mm: mglru: prevent min_seq[type] from pointing to an empty generation Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-07-31 8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] mm: mglru: let scan_folios() scan both reclaimable generations Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-01 6:18 ` Barry Song
2026-07-31 8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] mm/mglru: improve readability of isolate_folios() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-03 3:22 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-03 4:46 ` Barry Song
2026-08-03 5:33 ` Baolin Wang
2026-07-31 8:38 ` Barry Song (Xiaomi) [this message]
2026-07-31 23:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] mm: mglru: improve scan_folios() exhaustion detection Barry Song
2026-07-31 8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] mm: mglru: run aging when pages are severely imbalanced across gens Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-07-31 8:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] mm: mglru: run aging if the preferred type has no folios in reclaimable gens Barry Song (Xiaomi)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731083843.37811-5-baohua@kernel.org \
--to=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox