From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Make allowed_cpus idle validation race-free
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 08:08:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803060930.4111746-3-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803060930.4111746-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
A remotely selected CPU can be re-advertised as idle by an idle-to-idle
re-pick before the BPF program validates the selection. Checking that
the selected CPU remains absent from the idle mask is therefore
inherently racy.
Validate a stable local invariant instead: a CPU executing
ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue() in a non-idle scheduling context must
not be advertised as idle. Read the idle mask without modifying it and
also validate selected CPUs against the requested domain and task
affinity.
Suggested-by: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
.../selftests/sched_ext/allowed_cpus.bpf.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/allowed_cpus.bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/allowed_cpus.bpf.c
index 35923e74a2ec3..9dd72d0da29b2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/allowed_cpus.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched_ext/allowed_cpus.bpf.c
@@ -15,15 +15,48 @@ UEI_DEFINE(uei);
private(PREF_CPUS) struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * allowed_cpumask;
static void
-validate_idle_cpu(const struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *allowed, s32 cpu)
+validate_local_idle_state(void)
{
- if (scx_bpf_test_and_clear_cpu_idle(cpu))
- scx_bpf_error("CPU %d should be marked as busy", cpu);
+ const struct cpumask *idle;
+ struct task_struct *curr;
+ s32 cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+ bool cpu_is_idle, curr_is_idle;
- if (bpf_cpumask_subset(allowed, p->cpus_ptr) &&
- !bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, allowed))
+ bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+ curr = scx_bpf_cpu_curr(cpu);
+ curr_is_idle = curr && (curr->flags & PF_IDLE);
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ idle = scx_bpf_get_idle_cpumask();
+ cpu_is_idle = bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, idle);
+ scx_bpf_put_idle_cpumask(idle);
+
+ /*
+ * Unlike a remote selected CPU, the local CPU cannot go through an
+ * idle re-pick while this callback is running. If it is running a
+ * non-idle scheduling context, it must not be advertised as idle.
+ */
+ if (!curr_is_idle && cpu_is_idle)
+ scx_bpf_error("running CPU %d should be marked as busy", cpu);
+}
+
+static void
+validate_selected_cpu(const struct task_struct *p, s32 cpu)
+{
+ const struct cpumask *allowed = cast_mask(allowed_cpumask);
+
+ if (!allowed) {
+ scx_bpf_error("allowed domain not initialized");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, allowed))
scx_bpf_error("CPU %d not in the allowed domain for %d (%s)",
cpu, p->pid, p->comm);
+
+ if (!bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+ scx_bpf_error("CPU %d not in the affinity mask for %d (%s)",
+ cpu, p->pid, p->comm);
}
s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(allowed_cpus_select_cpu,
@@ -32,6 +65,7 @@ s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(allowed_cpus_select_cpu,
const struct cpumask *allowed;
s32 cpu;
+ validate_local_idle_state();
allowed = cast_mask(allowed_cpumask);
if (!allowed) {
scx_bpf_error("allowed domain not initialized");
@@ -43,7 +77,7 @@ s32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(allowed_cpus_select_cpu,
*/
cpu = scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, allowed, 0);
if (cpu >= 0) {
- validate_idle_cpu(p, allowed, cpu);
+ validate_selected_cpu(p, cpu);
scx_bpf_dsq_insert(p, SCX_DSQ_LOCAL, SCX_SLICE_DFL, 0);
return cpu;
@@ -59,6 +93,7 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(allowed_cpus_enqueue, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
scx_bpf_dsq_insert(p, SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL, SCX_SLICE_DFL, 0);
+ validate_local_idle_state();
allowed = cast_mask(allowed_cpumask);
if (!allowed) {
scx_bpf_error("allowed domain not initialized");
@@ -71,7 +106,7 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(allowed_cpus_enqueue, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
*/
cpu = scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(p, prev_cpu, 0, allowed, 0);
if (cpu >= 0) {
- validate_idle_cpu(p, allowed, cpu);
+ validate_selected_cpu(p, cpu);
scx_bpf_kick_cpu(cpu, SCX_KICK_IDLE);
}
}
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 6:08 [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Fix idle CPU state initialization and validation Andrea Righi
2026-08-03 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Initialize idle masks as busy Andrea Righi
2026-08-03 6:08 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-08-03 8:41 ` [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Fix idle CPU state initialization and validation Kuba Piecuch
2026-08-03 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-31 18:23 [PATCHSET v3 " Andrea Righi
2026-07-31 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Make allowed_cpus idle validation race-free Andrea Righi
2026-07-31 8:59 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Fix idle CPU state initialization and validation Andrea Righi
2026-07-31 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Make allowed_cpus idle validation race-free Andrea Righi
2026-07-31 11:12 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-07-31 15:26 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-01 10:35 ` Kuba Piecuch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803060930.4111746-3-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=jpiecuch@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox