From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9743D2D23A6; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785766389; cv=none; b=NVtRJI3p6WX5UuVjbmuVQwdzoHsadsmKimV0Bey3E5Nq51Yvj2Iqgi5bsoLAnIzELUfeyZj1zoy83boZLBAbzoGYc5oJIzzZkUIEi1FO8XZTo0Qktrc+9oznR4+GItzyGnVHlHXMU4avz8vxSVzN80wv39jUlXkB2i2CEdQ5dJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785766389; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YMNvusX9LkKSyLKyFVXEOeMchH7Hgn44IJ52cwQeKJw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GufN4K0/3XMiSqxSjLectzg2kZWwpGCyMOPKUzprR7ThQrKsGVmmOyhWZSG1JfqERhpXLCYPqISRsWgM4ibPZNjbAd6545kHmJpsE+Eio2FTfExdAR7ELcZjLzpJ9HczMqKNjV5hiklxPxYm6Z2fF3u6h4mprj+t7VL58/rThrs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HNVNklkB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HNVNklkB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3744E1F000E9; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:13:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785766388; bh=ZvuX3gYi0iFYh3K/3zoFONlt8miaxRz0FW6PbvfW+CA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=HNVNklkBqBtRhyKSY3TW0c2Sapiig58cPzEbfBnhyKxG4P10SiQaKB6BBl6NAoxNQ 4Z5dcmbqPljiloJsSoFCXTEqkqmt42ziFjCX92AlLpD/cwQCIjDLrwyCfB8/ci3mEY dV3uDK1opzozzNEO978RkJ+pk2z+h5+U79HnrShlRxrZrxBC1HhQULxMSXrMHXXy7F UuRuy5E73wa+7gU1n0ppdCIRb6kiCe5WSNLwnn4RBbuvRtXYP1/F0LgJ1GAz2cS/S5 77HLDo+sQTXpHug6B1+boWye8T5KubiEaQVPN2UkiW+efTOmTVG7s7WixwPNbA+1C4 OuL8NT6PEeiIg== Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:13:07 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Changhuang Liang Cc: Linus Walleij , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , Paul Walmsley , Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , Alexandre Ghiti , Philipp Zabel , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Lianfeng Ouyang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/21] dt-bindings: pincfg-node: Add property 'input-debounce-ns' Message-ID: <20260803141307.GA3243695-robh@kernel.org> References: <20260801072711.153217-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> <20260801072711.153217-2-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260801072711.153217-2-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> On Sat, Aug 01, 2026 at 12:26:51AM -0700, Changhuang Liang wrote: > Add the property 'input-debounce-ns' to specify debounce time in > nanoseconds as an alternative to the existing 'input-debounce' which > uses microseconds. Make the new property unavailable when the existing > property 'input-debounce' is selected to prevent conflicting definitions. Why do we need this? Why is usec resolution not good enough? That's what your commit msg should answer, not explain the diff which I can read myself. Rob