From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
quic_dmukhopa@quicinc.com, quic_rampraka@quicinc.com,
quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com, quic_sachgupt@quicinc.com,
quic_bhaskarv@quicinc.com, quic_gaurkash@quicinc.com,
quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com, ram.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Use pm ops instead of macro to restore crypto keys
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:18:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803201803.GB63318@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803163123.1802005-3-neeraj.soni@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 10:01:23PM +0530, Neeraj Soni wrote:
> From: Ram Prakash Gupta <ram.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) keys are lost after hibernation entry and this
> needs to be restored when hibernation exits. ICE keys are re-programmed
> during sdhci_msm_ice_init() but it may not cover cases where the
> hibernation image is already restored.
>
> Unwrap the pm ops and use directly in driver to add the call to restore
> Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) keys. This ensures that ICE is brought into
> same state as before hibernation.
>
> Also set MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO_NO_REPROG to indicate that re-programming of ICE
> keys is not needed during MMC runtime suspend/resume.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Prakash Gupta <ram.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Seshu Madhavi Puppala <quic_spuppala@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ram Prakash Gupta <quic_rampraka@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Prakash Gupta <quic_rampraka@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Sarthak Garg <quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Debraj Mukhopadhyay <quic_dmukhopa@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 4aff965f0e2e..f64788a70309 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -1959,6 +1959,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_ice_init(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> }
>
> mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO;
> + mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO_NO_REPROG;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2983,9 +2984,29 @@ static int sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int sdhci_msm_restore(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO)
> + blk_crypto_reprogram_all_keys(&host->mmc->crypto_profile);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Sorry, it looks like this actually does need an #ifdef because the
crypto_profile field is conditional. It doesn't need to be a new #ifdef
though, as you could add a function sdhci_msm_ice_restore() within the
existing CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO section of this file (along with a no-op stub
in the !CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO section), then call it from here. Similar to
how the existing sdhci_msm_ice_resume() works, for example.
> static const struct dev_pm_ops sdhci_msm_pm_ops = {
> - SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
> RUNTIME_PM_OPS(sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend, sdhci_msm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> + .suspend = pm_runtime_force_suspend,
> + .resume = pm_runtime_force_resume,
> + .freeze = pm_runtime_force_suspend,
> + .restore = sdhci_msm_restore,
> + .thaw = pm_runtime_force_resume,
> + .poweroff = pm_runtime_force_suspend,
Should these use pm_sleep_ptr() to allow dead code elimination when
!CONFIG_PM_SLEEP?
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 16:31 [PATCH v6 0/2] mmc: Avoid reprogram all keys to Inline Crypto Engine for MMC runtime suspend resume Neeraj Soni
2026-08-03 16:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] mmc: Allow host driver to control the re-programming of crypto keys Neeraj Soni
2026-08-03 18:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-08-03 20:13 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-03 16:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Use pm ops instead of macro to restore " Neeraj Soni
2026-08-03 18:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-08-04 11:14 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-08-03 20:18 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803201803.GB63318@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.soni@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_bhaskarv@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_dmukhopa@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_gaurkash@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rampraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sachgupt@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com \
--cc=ram.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox