The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yichong Chen <chenyichong@uniontech.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	willy@infradead.org, kees@kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devpts: fix pty count limit off by one
Date: Tue,  4 Aug 2026 17:52:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804095252.889108-1-chenyichong@uniontech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026080419-chatting-curve-e49c@gregkh>

Hi Greg,

Yes, this is user-visible.

The reason I sent the patch is that this used to allow pty_count to reach
the configured limit.  Before commit 0f0a0e54a2a1 ("devpts: Convert to new
IDA API"), devpts_new_index() checked the old pty_count first and only
incremented it after the allocation succeeded:

  if (pty_count >= limit)
          return -ENOSPC;
  ...
  pty_count++;

After that commit, the code started using atomic_inc_return(), but kept the
>= comparison:

  if (atomic_inc_return(&pty_count) >= limit)
          goto out;

So a count equal to the configured limit became rejected.  That makes
kernel.pty.max behave as an effective max - 1 limit.

I thought allowing the count to reach kernel.pty.max again would better
match the usual interpretation of a "max" sysctl.  But I agree this also
changes visible behavior again, and the current max - 1 behavior has been
around since 2018.

So if you prefer to preserve the existing behavior for compatibility, I am
fine with dropping the patch.

Thanks,
Yichong

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04  8:23 [PATCH] devpts: fix pty count limit off by one Yichong Chen
2026-08-04  8:40 ` Greg KH
2026-08-04  9:52   ` Yichong Chen [this message]
2026-08-04 10:06     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804095252.889108-1-chenyichong@uniontech.com \
    --to=chenyichong@uniontech.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox