From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] workqueue: skip the node_nr_active update for non-unbound workqueues
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:52:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805-wq-pool-refactor-v2-9-fd498d01d695@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805-wq-pool-refactor-v2-0-fd498d01d695@debian.org>
apply_wqattrs_commit() updates node_nr_active->max unconditionally.
wq->node_nr_active[] is only allocated for unbound workqueues, so guard
the call before per-cpu workqueues start using this path.
No functional change: only unbound workqueues reach apply_wqattrs_*()
today.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 65ac75431c3be..8fd6af72ffd8d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5556,8 +5556,9 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
ctx->pwq_tbl[cpu]);
ctx->dfl_pwq = install_unbound_pwq(ctx->wq, -1, ctx->dfl_pwq);
- /* update node_nr_active->max */
- wq_update_node_max_active(ctx->wq, -1);
+ /* update node_nr_active->max, which only unbound workqueues have */
+ if (ctx->wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
+ wq_update_node_max_active(ctx->wq, -1);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
}
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/9] workqueue: base pwq pool release and nr_active on the backing pool Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] workqueue: factor out get_percpu_pool() Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] workqueue: factor out alloc_and_link_percpu_pwqs() Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] workqueue: release pwq pools by pool type Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] workqueue: account nr_active by the backing pool Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 21:41 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-11 10:15 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] workqueue: test WQ_UNBOUND explicitly in the hotplug loops Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] workqueue: rename wq->unbound_attrs to wq->attrs Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] workqueue: allocate attrs for all workqueues Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] workqueue: rename alloc_unbound_pwq() to alloc_pwq() Breno Leitao
2026-08-05 14:52 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-08-10 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] workqueue: base pwq pool release and nr_active on the backing pool Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805-wq-pool-refactor-v2-9-fd498d01d695@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox