The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Pal <kuncy7@gmail.com>
To: Jie Luo <jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Mieczyslaw Nalewaj <namiltd@yahoo.com>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: keep the CMN block bus clocks enabled
Date: Wed,  5 Aug 2026 10:12:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805081240.11497-1-kuncy7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dc44e5e-7787-47f7-938f-1ac0676d96d2@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 8/5/2026 Jie Luo wrote:
> Is there any use case that requires accessing the CMN PLL registers when
> no downstream consumer is active? If not, I don't think a fix is needed
> here. As you may have observed, debugfs clk_summary can still display
> the clock rate correctly even when there is no downstream consumer and
> the AHB and SYS clocks are disabled.

The clk_summary observation does not show what it seems to show, and I
have to correct my own previous mail on the same point: this driver does
not set CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, and clk_core_get_rate_recalc() only calls
.recalc_rate for clocks that have that flag. So clk_summary (and
clk_get_rate()) return the rate cached at registration time, when probe
still held the bus clocks enabled - no register access happens at all.
It displaying correct rates with the clocks gated is exactly the cached
value; it says nothing about whether an actual access would survive.

As for the use case: on IPQ5018 it is booting the SoC. With the clocks
gated after probe, boards hang within milliseconds - 100% reproducible
on some builds, before userspace exists, with no consumer anywhere - and
the only variable that changes the outcome is holding this reference.
That is also why I do not think moving runtime PM references into the
clk ops would help this platform: by your own argument nothing calls the
ops at that point, yet the SoC still dies. Whatever the fatal access is
- a CCF path we have not pinned down, or something else in the same
clock domain - the platform demonstrably does not survive the gate
itself.

One more general point: the CCF gives no guarantee that clk API calls
only happen while some consumer device is runtime-active. The DT device
link keeps the supplier active while the consumer *device* is active,
but a consumer is free to call clk_set_rate()/clk_round_rate() at any
time, including while itself runtime-suspended - and on IPQ5018 there is
no link at all. So "registers are only accessed while a consumer is
active" is not an invariant anything enforces; it just happens to hold
on the platforms where the DT wiring exists.

If there is an alternative fix you would prefer - a different clock
handoff from the bootloader state, describing the in-silicon consumers
in DT, anything else - I am happy to test it on this hardware. But as it
stands, a mainline kernel cannot boot reliably on IPQ5018 without this
change, which is why I believe a fix is needed and Cc'd stable.

Thanks,
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 19:13 [PATCH] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: keep the CMN block bus clocks enabled Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-02 20:53 ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-03  7:14 ` Jie Luo
2026-08-03  9:10   ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-04 11:03     ` Jie Luo
2026-08-04 11:58       ` Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-05  4:52         ` Jie Luo
2026-08-05  8:12           ` Stanislaw Pal [this message]
2026-08-06  2:33             ` Jie Luo
2026-08-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Stanislaw Pal
2026-08-05 18:53   ` Mieczyslaw Nalewaj
2026-08-05 19:36   ` [PATCH v3] " Stanislaw Pal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805081240.11497-1-kuncy7@gmail.com \
    --to=kuncy7@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=namiltd@yahoo.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox