From: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] char: xillybus: Improve control of execution flow with mutexes
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 11:34:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805093436.59740-2-eli.billauer@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805093436.59740-1-eli.billauer@gmail.com>
This commit addresses two issues by using mutexes:
(1) Add a mutex to protect the fifo_buf_order global variable. The
purpose of this variable is avoid repeated failed calls to
__get_free_pages() for allocating FIFO memory, when the chunk
size was too big. However, if two drivers are initialized at the
same time, fifo_init() may run in parallel, and fifo_buf_order
may be reduced too much. This is a far-fetched scenario, now
completely prevented by fifo_buf_order_mutex.
(2) setup_channels() acquires process_in_mutex to prevent
process_bulk_in() from accessing the xillyusb_dev struct. With
correctly working hardware, process_bulk_in() is never called while
setup_channels() runs, because the device has no reason to send data
in that phase. The mutex ensures that process_bulk_in() does not
touch the members that setup_channels() alters.
There is no similar protection for data flow in the other direction,
because during the setup process, the only outbound data is the
BULK endpoint used for commands, and it remains untouched after its
initial setup.
Assisted-by: Deepseek:v4-pro Kimi:K2.6 ChatGPT:GPT-5.5 Claude:Sonnet-4.6
Assisted-by: Sashiko-0.2.5:gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Signed-off-by: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@gmail.com>
---
Notes:
Changelog:
=========
Changes v3->v4:
-- Use plain mutex_lock() in fifo_init() rather than guard() in order
to avoid mixing guard() with goto, following Sashiko's remark + add
attribution to Sashiko for this.
Changes v2->v3:
-- Add Assisted-by tag to description
No change on v1->v2.
drivers/char/xillybus/xillyusb.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/xillybus/xillyusb.c b/drivers/char/xillybus/xillyusb.c
index 34e7ad3bcab3..560c3568fc96 100644
--- a/drivers/char/xillybus/xillyusb.c
+++ b/drivers/char/xillybus/xillyusb.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
static const char xillyname[] = "xillyusb";
static unsigned int fifo_buf_order;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(fifo_buf_order_mutex);
static struct workqueue_struct *wakeup_wq;
#define USB_VENDOR_ID_XILINX 0x03fd
@@ -375,6 +376,8 @@ static int fifo_init(struct xillyfifo *fifo,
unsigned int log2_fifo_buf_size;
+ mutex_lock(&fifo_buf_order_mutex);
+
retry:
log2_fifo_buf_size = fifo_buf_order + PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -395,8 +398,10 @@ static int fifo_init(struct xillyfifo *fifo,
fifo->mem = kmalloc_array(fifo->bufnum, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!fifo->mem)
+ if (!fifo->mem) {
+ mutex_unlock(&fifo_buf_order_mutex);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < fifo->bufnum; i++) {
fifo->mem[i] = (void *)
@@ -413,6 +418,8 @@ static int fifo_init(struct xillyfifo *fifo,
fifo->writebuf = 0;
spin_lock_init(&fifo->lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&fifo->waitq);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&fifo_buf_order_mutex);
return 0;
memfail:
@@ -426,6 +433,7 @@ static int fifo_init(struct xillyfifo *fifo,
fifo_buf_order--;
goto retry;
} else {
+ mutex_unlock(&fifo_buf_order_mutex);
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
@@ -1943,6 +1951,9 @@ static int setup_channels(struct xillyusb_dev *xdev,
struct xillyusb_channel *chan, *new_channels;
int i;
+ /* Don't let process_bulk_in() run while we change the channels */
+ guard(mutex)(&xdev->process_in_mutex);
+
chan = kzalloc_objs(*chan, num_channels);
if (!chan)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 9:34 [PATCH v4 0/7] char: xillybus: Harden driver and improve code quality Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 9:34 ` Eli Billauer [this message]
2026-08-05 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] char: xillybus: Remove duplicate error path code Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] char: xillybus: Avoid possible bandwidth inefficiency Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] char: xillybus: Use unsigned arithmetic for jiffies differences Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] char: xillybus: Integer arithmetic improvements Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] char: xillybus: Add defensive sanity checks Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 9:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] char: xillybus: Ignore and report unsolicited interrupts Eli Billauer
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] char: xillybus: Harden driver and improve code quality Eli Billauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805093436.59740-2-eli.billauer@gmail.com \
--to=eli.billauer@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox