From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: juny24602@gmail.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, junvyyang@tencent.com, stable@kernel.org,
corvus@tencent.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] sctp: fix stream->outcnt underflow on duplicate RECONF responses
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 13:35:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805123525.571744-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804113100.37840-1-juny24602@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804113100.37840-1-juny24602@gmail.com?part=1
---
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net v2] sctp: fix stream->outcnt underflow on duplicate RECONF responses ---
commit 9a827b81b27b219603b09c1f04c9dbc9a6dd2368
Author: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
sctp: fix stream->outcnt underflow on duplicate RECONF responses
This commit addresses a bug where duplicate RECONF responses could cause
stream->outcnt to underflow. It converts strreset_outstanding into a bitmask
to track request parameter types, ensuring duplicate responses are ignored.
> diff --git a/net/sctp/stream.c b/net/sctp/stream.c
> index 34ffe6c945a4b..cb7543929d657 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/stream.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/stream.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -928,7 +936,7 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_process_strreset_resp(
> __u32 result;
>
> req = sctp_chunk_lookup_strreset_param(asoc, resp->response_seq, 0);
> - if (!req)
> + if (!req || !SCTP_STRRESET_TEST(asoc, req->type))
> return NULL;
[Severity: High]
Could the new duplicate-drop logic permanently drop legitimate responses when
the sequence number wraps to 0?
If a user calls setsockopt(SCTP_ADD_STREAMS) with both incoming and outgoing
streams when asoc->strreset_outseq is exactly 0xFFFFFFFF, it creates a RECONF
chunk with request_seq = 0xFFFFFFFF for ADD_OUT and request_seq = 0 for
ADD_IN.
When the peer responds to the ADD_IN request with resp_seq = 0,
sctp_chunk_lookup_strreset_param() handles it:
net/sctp/stream.c:sctp_chunk_lookup_strreset_param() {
...
if ((!resp_seq || req->request_seq == resp_seq) &&
(!type || type == req->param_hdr.type))
return param.v;
...
}
Because resp_seq is 0, the !resp_seq check bypasses sequence matching and
returns the first parameter in the chunk (ADD_OUT).
Since the ADD_OUT bit was already cleared by the first response, the new
!SCTP_STRRESET_TEST() check here would see the bit is cleared and drop the
response as a duplicate.
This would leave the ADD_IN bit set forever, preventing the RECONF chunk from
being freed and causing the association to hang due to endless
retransmissions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 11:29 [PATCH net v2] sctp: fix stream->outcnt underflow on duplicate RECONF responses Jun Yang
2026-08-05 12:35 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-08-05 16:14 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805123525.571744-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=corvus@tencent.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=junvyyang@tencent.com \
--cc=juny24602@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox