From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Stefano Sanfilippo <ssanfilippo@chromium.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:30:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805133013.235016-13-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805133013.235016-1-acme@kernel.org>
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
jit_repipe_unwinding_info() copies unwinding_size and eh_frame_hdr_size
from the jitdump record into jd-> fields without checking them against
the actual payload size. Downstream, jit_add_eh_frame_info() in
genelf.c computes unwinding_table_size = unwinding_size -
eh_frame_hdr_size, which underflows when eh_frame_hdr_size >
unwinding_size. The result is passed as d->d_size to libelf, causing
an OOB heap read into the output ELF file.
Validate that unwinding_size fits within the record payload and that
eh_frame_hdr_size does not exceed unwinding_size before allocating or
storing the values, so a bogus record cannot force a large allocation
that is then discarded.
mapped_size is likewise taken from the record and was narrowed into an
int for the mmap2 len computation in jit_repipe_code_load() and
jit_repipe_code_move(); values above INT_MAX would turn negative,
producing a wrong mmap2 length. Use uint64_t for usize so the value
cannot truncate.
Fixes: 0284fecd13b6db3e ("perf jit: Add unwinding support")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefano Sanfilippo <ssanfilippo@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
Assisted-by: Opencode:mimo-v2.5-free
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/jitdump.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
index 5f3a53f818c29f58..385c19b864aeee4c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
@@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_load(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
u16 idr_size;
const char *sym;
uint64_t count;
- int ret, csize, usize;
+ int ret, csize;
+ uint64_t usize;
pid_t nspid, pid, tid;
struct {
u32 pid, tid;
@@ -543,7 +544,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_load(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
event->mmap2.pgoff = GEN_ELF_TEXT_OFFSET;
event->mmap2.start = addr;
- event->mmap2.len = usize ? ALIGN_8(csize) + usize : csize;
+ event->mmap2.len = usize ? ALIGN_8((uint64_t)csize) + usize : (uint64_t)csize;
event->mmap2.pid = pid;
event->mmap2.tid = tid;
event->mmap2.ino = st.st_ino;
@@ -612,7 +613,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_move(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
char *filename;
size_t size;
struct stat st;
- int usize;
+ uint64_t usize;
u16 idr_size;
int ret;
pid_t nspid, pid, tid;
@@ -761,6 +762,18 @@ jit_repipe_unwinding_info(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
return -1;
unwinding_data_size = jr->prefix.total_size - sizeof(jr->unwinding);
+
+ /*
+ * Validate sizes before allocating — jit_add_eh_frame_info()
+ * computes unwinding_size - eh_frame_hdr_size and uses the
+ * result as a buffer length for libelf.
+ */
+ if (jr->unwinding.unwinding_size > unwinding_data_size ||
+ jr->unwinding.eh_frame_hdr_size > jr->unwinding.unwinding_size) {
+ pr_warning("jitdump: invalid unwinding sizes in unwinding_info record\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
unwinding_data = malloc(unwinding_data_size);
if (!unwinding_data)
return -1;
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 13:29 [PATCHES v1 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf jitdump: Fix extended header read that always fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 18:51 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf jitdump: Validate code_size against total_size in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 18:58 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf jitdump: Prevent integer underflow in debug info size calculation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 18:59 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf jitdump: Bounds-check debug entry byte-swap loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:00 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:07 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 19:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:29 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf jitdump: Fix funlockfile on unlocked stream in jit_open() error path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:10 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf jitdump: Use dirname() return value in jit_open() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:16 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf jitdump: Validate debug entries on native (non-swap) path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:19 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf jitdump: Validate sym string NUL-termination in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:19 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-08-05 19:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Ian Rogers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-05 21:26 [PATCHES v2 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:27 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:35 [PATCHES v3 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-06 12:36 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805133013.235016-13-acme@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ssanfilippo@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox