From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B8D238DC47; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 23:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785974300; cv=none; b=i+0qsIE0TujnwV3dTmt2H9d/agZZ/Gqi58U/8M5sUhk/8F1/wT9kJzsoOGnOOXMZv7yxOqnT04Tj9hB6Gh9eQI/CcAMlNHUfQw6H8z5qJuQqhXg/NbkI/h3meo2CQC/tku1jzU5SzdK1qIMYJr+atrHeqEgDp0CKYNgJfbjaPtM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785974300; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MIVuTk333BYqIbXd67FKdW/CrRrL1m38lPBg9y5T3vo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WBtNpJUha8w/RGvQw8+S173znhCBsT3zHu+0rI/v/NEIUaYkc6IM7H/IOxKyiKpKHibu2y3LgysxQ828xyA3YuaJwKUgq7S2+QLIBaDzmkn6SRxhwUI0e1OakrB1iOjyUYsxeAbHoYjTPX8Wfkxg44OtlNU47oEXABG9UARY3kE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=defL41jO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="defL41jO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AF7F1F000E9; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 23:58:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785974298; bh=LK3LpL5DIfHsv7p4kHelM9RD9rQo0Pv3wEFsj5+wCAI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=defL41jOxBfreL/isZ+EY3kDdQazNw1iNl/M0QWeusMc9hLEOhpxd8c+Jxxpf5F79 to3zRiI1J7VpKA3vDpAGZnnBVi8lHEGz0hCkwPSGhWIu8Qb2oJb5+38DO2JT+9epiG dPV+eLFjg5qRZ88Q06PZudU9aZr/vddI+sZrLlxJ0hgLijAHc4HGUygHsL7vidG45e uIaVSXb6ifSB5h2tdxSUGe+nhxEoNB3M8p1FI3e2abcgS3xnTHb0BC2C1+re1uId0u xbCvFt7wvkNubHGZqCsWlltAj6LzS1VTN96zjgGKuZqGSSMDmaOSvv1iHtKOFsVAsS a9UQA6jSbgFRw== Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 16:58:17 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Pavel Begunkov Cc: syzbot , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] WARNING in netdev_queue_get_dma_dev Message-ID: <20260805165817.7e1fc367@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <0a419b0b-18d6-42a4-962d-301ddd9d4498@gmail.com> References: <6a71f80c.40259c87.584f4.04b9.GAE@google.com> <20260804140006.0210f6ca@kernel.org> <0a419b0b-18d6-42a4-962d-301ddd9d4498@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:51:10 +0100 Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 8/4/26 22:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Hi Pavel, could you TAL? > > It complains on not holding rtnl, so the netdev should be not > qops-enabled, and we acquire it with netdev_get_by_index_lock(). > It's going to be rejected later, but not sure whether netdev->lock > protects its device and leasing logic well in this case. Hm, I see. > As a quick fix, let's fail it early in zcrx if there is no qops. I think we can switch the lockdep check in netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() to netdev_assert_locked(dev)? Nothing should be calling that function under rtnl_lock so the _compat() is a brainfart.