From: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
To: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com, r33s3n6@gmail.com, zzzccc427@gmail.com,
ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: fix deadlock in inline-data truncate transactions
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 11:59:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806035947.2451857-1-gality369@gmail.com> (raw)
[BUG]
Updating an inode xattr can cause an ABBA deadlock with
inline file truncation.
ocfs2_truncate_file()
down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem)
ocfs2_truncate_inline()
ocfs2_start_trans()
ocfs2_xattr_set()
ocfs2_start_trans()
ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set()
down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem)
[CAUSE]
The xattr set path starts its merged transaction before the helpers which
modify inode-body xattrs acquire ip_alloc_sem. This creates the reverse of
the ip_alloc_sem -> transaction order used by the allocation and truncate
paths. The transaction merge in
commit 85db90e77806 ("ocfs2/xattr: Merge xattr set transaction.")
introduced this ordering for ordinary xattr updates.
The create-time transaction -> ip_xattr_sem dependency is a separate case.
The fix in
commit c13024342c82 ("ocfs2: fix circular locking dependency in ocfs2_init_acl()")
prepares the parent ACL before the create transaction and avoids the xattr
semaphore for initial xattrs on an unpublished inode. That change does not
cover ordinary ocfs2_xattr_set().
[FIX]
Acquire ip_alloc_sem in ocfs2_xattr_set() before xattr preparation,
allocation reservations, and transaction start. Tell the inode-body and
indexed-block helpers when the semaphore is already held, while preserving
their local locking for callers that do not provide outer protection.
Keep the existing ip_alloc_sem -> transaction order in allocation and
truncate paths; fixing the xattr side avoids changing that established
ordering.
Fixes: 85db90e77806 ("ocfs2/xattr: Merge xattr set transaction.")
Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Fix the xattr side of the lock ordering based on Joseph's feedback.
- Explain why the remaining fix belongs on the ordinary xattr side.
---
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index 35bcbb0ff607..27bea1f360a1 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt {
struct ocfs2_alloc_context *data_ac;
struct ocfs2_cached_dealloc_ctxt dealloc;
int set_abort;
+ int alloc_sem_protected;
};
#define OCFS2_XATTR_ROOT_SIZE (sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_def_value_root))
@@ -2916,7 +2917,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_has_space_inline(struct inode *inode,
static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(struct inode *inode,
int name_index,
const char *name,
- struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
+ struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs,
+ int lock_alloc_sem)
{
struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)xs->inode_bh->b_data;
@@ -2927,9 +2929,11 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(struct inode *inode,
return 0;
if (!(oi->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_XATTR_FL)) {
- down_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ if (lock_alloc_sem)
+ down_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
has_space = ocfs2_xattr_has_space_inline(inode, di);
- up_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ if (lock_alloc_sem)
+ up_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
if (!has_space)
return 0;
}
@@ -3016,14 +3020,17 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set(struct inode *inode,
struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs,
struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt *ctxt)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, took_alloc_sem = 0;
struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
struct ocfs2_xa_loc loc;
if (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize == OCFS2_MIN_BLOCKSIZE)
return -ENOSPC;
- down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ if (!ctxt->alloc_sem_protected) {
+ down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ took_alloc_sem = 1;
+ }
if (!(oi->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_XATTR_FL)) {
ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_init(inode, xs->inode_bh, ctxt);
if (ret) {
@@ -3044,7 +3051,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set(struct inode *inode,
xs->here = loc.xl_entry;
out:
- up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ if (took_alloc_sem)
+ up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
return ret;
}
@@ -3729,6 +3737,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle,
.handle = handle,
.meta_ac = meta_ac,
.data_ac = data_ac,
+ .alloc_sem_protected = 1,
};
if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)))
@@ -3750,7 +3759,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle,
xis.inode_bh = xbs.inode_bh = di_bh;
di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
- ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis);
+ ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis, 0);
if (ret)
goto cleanup;
if (xis.not_found) {
@@ -3834,7 +3843,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
* Scan inode and external block to find the same name
* extended attribute and collect search information.
*/
- ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis);
+ ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis, 1);
if (ret)
goto cleanup;
if (xis.not_found) {
@@ -3856,6 +3865,8 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
goto cleanup;
}
+ down_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
+
/* Check whether the value is refcounted and do some preparation. */
if (ocfs2_is_refcount_inode(inode) &&
(!xis.not_found || !xbs.not_found)) {
@@ -3864,7 +3875,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
&ref_meta, &ref_credits);
if (ret) {
mlog_errno(ret);
- goto cleanup;
+ goto out_unlock_alloc;
}
}
@@ -3875,7 +3886,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
if (ret < 0) {
inode_unlock(tl_inode);
mlog_errno(ret);
- goto cleanup;
+ goto out_unlock_alloc;
}
}
inode_unlock(tl_inode);
@@ -3884,8 +3895,9 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
&xbs, &ctxt, ref_meta, &credits);
if (ret) {
mlog_errno(ret);
- goto cleanup;
+ goto out_unlock_alloc;
}
+ ctxt.alloc_sem_protected = 1;
/* we need to update inode's ctime field, so add credit for it. */
credits += OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS;
@@ -3893,15 +3905,15 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
if (IS_ERR(ctxt.handle)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(ctxt.handle);
mlog_errno(ret);
- goto out_free_ac;
+ goto out_unlock_alloc;
}
ret = __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(inode, di, &xi, &xis, &xbs, &ctxt);
ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(ctxt.handle, inode, 0);
ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, ctxt.handle);
-
-out_free_ac:
+out_unlock_alloc:
+ up_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
if (ctxt.data_ac)
ocfs2_free_alloc_context(ctxt.data_ac);
if (ctxt.meta_ac)
@@ -4520,6 +4532,7 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_create_index_block(struct inode *inode,
u64 blkno;
handle_t *handle = ctxt->handle;
struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
+ int took_alloc_sem = 0;
struct buffer_head *xb_bh = xs->xattr_bh;
struct ocfs2_xattr_block *xb =
(struct ocfs2_xattr_block *)xb_bh->b_data;
@@ -4537,7 +4550,10 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_create_index_block(struct inode *inode,
* We can use this lock for now, and maybe move to a dedicated mutex
* if performance becomes a problem later.
*/
- down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ if (!ctxt->alloc_sem_protected) {
+ down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ took_alloc_sem = 1;
+ }
ret = ocfs2_journal_access_xb(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), xb_bh,
OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
@@ -4600,7 +4616,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_create_index_block(struct inode *inode,
ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, xb_bh);
out:
- up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ if (took_alloc_sem)
+ up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806035947.2451857-1-gality369@gmail.com \
--to=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=r33s3n6@gmail.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox