The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@gmail.com>,
	Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [tip:core/entry] [x86/entry]  1b1f3b3e1b: kselftests.x86.syscall_numbering_64.fail
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 16:32:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202608061019.b3aca16-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3283 bytes --]



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "kselftests.x86.syscall_numbering_64.fail" on:

commit: 1b1f3b3e1b3945ae6e49081fd3586a6833d4a555 ("x86/entry: Get rid of the sys_ni_syscall() indirection")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core/entry


in testcase: kselftests
version: kselftests-x86_64-f5098b6bae76-1_20260727
with following parameters:

	group: x86


config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-kselftests
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 16 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-13620H (Raptor Lake) with 32G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)



If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202608061019.b3aca16-lkp@intel.com



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260806/202608061019.b3aca16-lkp@intel.com


  836 # timeout set to 300
  837 # selftests: x86: syscall_numbering_64
  838 # [RUN]   Checking for x32 by calling x32 getpid()
  839 # [INFO]      x32 is not supported
  840 # [RUN]   Running tests without ptrace...
  841 # [RUN]       Checking system calls with msb = 0 (0x0)
  842 # [RUN]           Checking some common syscalls as 64 bit
  843 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:0 returned 0 as expected
  844 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:1 returned 0 as expected
  845 # [RUN]           Checking some 64-bit only syscalls as 64 bit
  846 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:19 returned 0 as expected
  847 # [OK]                x64 syscall 0:20 returned 0 as expected

...

 1452 # [RUN]           Checking out of range system calls
 1453 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-64 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1454 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-63 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1455 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-62 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1456 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-61 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1457 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-60 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1458 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-59 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
 1459 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall 0:-58 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS

... <huge number of these stuffs>

until ...

39542 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:996 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39543 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:997 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39544 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:998 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39545 # [FAIL]                  x32 syscall -2147483647:999 returned -9999, but it should have returned -ENOSYS
39546 # [FAIL]              x32 syscalls -2147483647:0..999 had 1000 failure
39547 # [FAIL]  A total of 37800 system calls had incorrect behavior
39548 not ok 18 selftests: x86: syscall_numbering_64 # exit=1


details in attached kselftests-1b1f3b3e1b.xz


-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


[-- Attachment #2: kselftests-1b1f3b3e1b.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 21196 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202608061019.b3aca16-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox