The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v3] ipv4: fix use-after-free in fib_nhc_update_mtu()
Date: Sat,  8 Aug 2026 02:17:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807181710.1178747-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com> (raw)

fib_nhc_update_mtu() walks the nexthop exception table under RTNL, but
RTNL does not serialize this walk with PMTU exception updates. The walk
uses rcu_dereference_protected() with a constant true condition without
holding fnhe_lock.

The following interleaving can therefore occur:

  CPU 0                              CPU 1
  fib_nhc_update_mtu()               update_or_create_fnhe()
    load fnhe                          spin_lock_bh(&fnhe_lock)
                                       fnhe_remove_oldest()
                                         unlink fnhe
                                         kfree_rcu(fnhe, rcu)
    <quiescent state>
    access fnhe after grace period

KASAN reported:

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in fib_nhc_update_mtu+0x3df/0x410
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888107d49000 by task poc/90
  Call Trace:
   fib_nhc_update_mtu+0x3df/0x410
   fib_sync_mtu+0x7a/0xd0
   fib_netdev_event+0x229/0x3f0
   netif_set_mtu_ext+0x33a/0x570
   dev_set_mtu+0x88/0x120

The same walk updates fnhe_pmtu and fnhe_mtu_locked. These fields form a
pair and other writers serialize them with fnhe_lock. RCU alone prevents
reclamation, but would still allow concurrent writers to leave a mixed
pair.

Walk the table under RCU and acquire fnhe_lock only while updating each
exception. RCU keeps the current entry alive while the short critical
section serializes its paired PMTU fields. This avoids holding the global
lock while scanning all 2048 buckets for every nexthop.

Fixes: af7d6cce5369 ("net: ipv4: update fnhe_pmtu when first hop's MTU changes")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>

---
Changes in v3:
- Walk the exception table under RCU.
- Move the PMTU update into route.c and take fnhe_lock around each entry
  update instead of exporting and holding it across the full table scan.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260806133309.731709-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/ [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731162938.3388534-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/ [v1]
---
 include/net/route.h      |  2 ++
 net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 34 +++++++++++-----------------------
 net/ipv4/route.c         | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
index f90106f383c5..45290177a33c 100644
--- a/include/net/route.h
+++ b/include/net/route.h
@@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ int fib_dump_info_fnhe(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
 		       u32 table_id, struct fib_info *fi,
 		       int *fa_index, int fa_start, unsigned int flags);
 
+void fnhe_update_pmtu(struct fib_nh_exception *fnhe, u32 new, u32 orig);
+
 static inline void ip_rt_put(struct rtable *rt)
 {
 	/* dst_release() accepts a NULL parameter.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
index 78f84ae3ee12..0483519b7fb0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
@@ -1895,42 +1895,30 @@ static int call_fib_nh_notifiers(struct fib_nh *nh,
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
-/* Update the PMTU of exceptions when:
- * - the new MTU of the first hop becomes smaller than the PMTU
- * - the old MTU was the same as the PMTU, and it limited discovery of
- *   larger MTUs on the path. With that limit raised, we can now
- *   discover larger MTUs
- * A special case is locked exceptions, for which the PMTU is smaller
- * than the minimal accepted PMTU:
- * - if the new MTU is greater than the PMTU, don't make any change
- * - otherwise, unlock and set PMTU
+/* Walk the exceptions of a nexthop after its first hop MTU changed. The
+ * chain is RCU protected here, while fnhe_update_pmtu() takes fnhe_lock
+ * for the update of each entry.
  */
 void fib_nhc_update_mtu(struct fib_nh_common *nhc, u32 new, u32 orig)
 {
 	struct fnhe_hash_bucket *bucket;
 	int i;
 
-	bucket = rcu_dereference_protected(nhc->nhc_exceptions, 1);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	bucket = rcu_dereference(nhc->nhc_exceptions);
 	if (!bucket)
-		return;
+		goto out;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < FNHE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
 		struct fib_nh_exception *fnhe;
 
-		for (fnhe = rcu_dereference_protected(bucket[i].chain, 1);
+		for (fnhe = rcu_dereference(bucket[i].chain);
 		     fnhe;
-		     fnhe = rcu_dereference_protected(fnhe->fnhe_next, 1)) {
-			if (fnhe->fnhe_mtu_locked) {
-				if (new <= fnhe->fnhe_pmtu) {
-					fnhe->fnhe_pmtu = new;
-					fnhe->fnhe_mtu_locked = false;
-				}
-			} else if (new < fnhe->fnhe_pmtu ||
-				   orig == fnhe->fnhe_pmtu) {
-				fnhe->fnhe_pmtu = new;
-			}
-		}
+		     fnhe = rcu_dereference(fnhe->fnhe_next))
+			fnhe_update_pmtu(fnhe, new, orig);
 	}
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 void fib_sync_mtu(struct net_device *dev, u32 orig_mtu)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 152d8cb28f65..b82401a6baed 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -741,6 +741,35 @@ static void update_or_create_fnhe(struct fib_nh_common *nhc, __be32 daddr,
 	spin_unlock_bh(&fnhe_lock);
 }
 
+/* Update the PMTU of an exception when:
+ * - the new MTU of the first hop becomes smaller than the PMTU
+ * - the old MTU was the same as the PMTU, and it limited discovery of
+ *   larger MTUs on the path. With that limit raised, we can now
+ *   discover larger MTUs
+ * A special case is locked exceptions, for which the PMTU is smaller
+ * than the minimal accepted PMTU:
+ * - if the new MTU is greater than the PMTU, don't make any change
+ * - otherwise, unlock and set PMTU
+ *
+ * fnhe_lock keeps fnhe_pmtu and fnhe_mtu_locked consistent against
+ * update_or_create_fnhe(), which sets both under the same lock.
+ */
+void fnhe_update_pmtu(struct fib_nh_exception *fnhe, u32 new, u32 orig)
+{
+	spin_lock_bh(&fnhe_lock);
+
+	if (fnhe->fnhe_mtu_locked) {
+		if (new <= fnhe->fnhe_pmtu) {
+			fnhe->fnhe_pmtu = new;
+			fnhe->fnhe_mtu_locked = false;
+		}
+	} else if (new < fnhe->fnhe_pmtu || orig == fnhe->fnhe_pmtu) {
+		fnhe->fnhe_pmtu = new;
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_bh(&fnhe_lock);
+}
+
 static void __ip_do_redirect(struct rtable *rt, struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi4 *fl4,
 			     bool kill_route)
 {
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 18:17 Chengfeng Ye [this message]
2026-08-09  7:12 ` [PATCH net v3] ipv4: fix use-after-free in fib_nhc_update_mtu() Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807181710.1178747-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
    --to=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox