From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Aditya Chari S <adi25charis@gmail.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] greybus: usb: fix response buffer size for fixed-length hub requests
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 07:46:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026080805-unsuited-sandy-ed29@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803010248.339120-1-adi25charis@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 06:32:48AM +0530, Aditya Chari S wrote:
> hub_control() sized the Greybus operation's response buffer purely
> off the caller-supplied wLength. However, per the USB hub class spec,
> GetHubDescriptor, GetHubStatus, and GetPortStatus have a response
> length that is fixed by the request type itself, and can be larger
> than (or independent of) whatever wLength the USB core happens to
> pass down. This could under-allocate the response buffer for these
> request types.
>
> Special-case these three request types so the response buffer is
> always large enough for the data the module will actually send back,
> matching the equivalent handling in usbcore's rh_call_control(). Fall
> back to wLength for all other request types, as before.
>
> Compile-tested with 'make M=drivers/staging/greybus C=1', including
> sparse, with no warnings. checkpatch --strict is also clean.
>
> Note: this driver's hub_control() is currently unreachable at runtime
> since gb_usb_probe() unconditionally disables USB support pending
> separate USB core changes. As Project Ara hardware is no longer
> available, this change has not been tested on physical hardware or
> with a Greybus module; it was verified only by compilation, sparse,
> and code review against the equivalent logic in usbcore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Chari S <adi25charis@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/usb.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Cool, what tool was used to find this? Did you forget the Assisted-by:
tag?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 1:02 [PATCH] greybus: usb: fix response buffer size for fixed-length hub requests Aditya Chari S
2026-08-08 5:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-08-08 8:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-08-03 23:51 ` Aditya Chari S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026080805-unsuited-sandy-ed29@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adi25charis@gmail.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox