From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex@shazbot.org,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 13:07:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808170712.839066-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Patches 2/5 and 5/5 in this series were previously posted as individual
fixes upstream. During review of those patches, the reviewer identified
several pre-existing problems in the same code paths that are addressed
by the remaining three patches. All five patches are fixes for
pre-existing bugs and are tagged for stable.
Patches 1/5, 3/5 and 4/5 fix bugs in the call trees of the two
callback functions implemented by the vfio_ap device
driver -- vfio_ap_on_cfg_changed and vfio_ap_on_scan_complete:
* Patch 1/5 fixes a stale do_remove flag in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove
that causes spurious hot-unplug operations on mdevs that have no
assigned adapters, domains or control domains in common with those
removed from the host AP configuration.
* Patch 3/5 fixes the use of the wrong lock to protect the addition of
a newly created ap_matrix_mdev object to the mdev_list in the
vfio_ap_mdev_probe function.
* Patch 4/5 fixes the missing mdevs_lock while updating the apm_add,
aqm_add and adm_add fields of an ap_matrix_mdev object in
vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_add.
Anthony Krowiak (5):
s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in
vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove
s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for
NULL
s390/vfio-ap: Fix use of wrong lock in mdev probe function
s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of
ap_matrix_mdev object
s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 17:07 Anthony Krowiak [this message]
2026-08-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390/vfio-ap: Fix use of wrong lock in mdev probe function Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808170712.839066-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox