From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com,
neelx@suse.com, chjohnst@mail.com, mproche@mail.com,
sean@ashe.io, steve@abita.co, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] sched/debug: Protect lockless p->mm access in sched_show_numa()
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2026 21:58:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810015812.428999-4-atomlin@atomlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810015812.428999-1-atomlin@atomlin.com>
In sched_show_numa(), p->mm is checked locklessly and then passed to the
P(mm->numa_scan_seq) macro. This results in a double-evaluation of p->mm.
If the task exits concurrently via exit_mm(p) between the check and the
macro expansion, p->mm can be set to NULL on another CPU. The second
evaluation then dereferences a NULL pointer.
Fix this TOCTOU race by reading p->mm once into a local variable using
READ_ONCE(p->mm) before checking and dereferencing its numa_scan_seq
field.
Fixes: b32e86b4301e ("sched/numa: Add debugging")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
---
kernel/sched/debug.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index c3409166a288..f5494e02f600 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -1317,8 +1317,10 @@ void print_numa_stats(struct seq_file *m, int node, unsigned long tsf,
static void sched_show_numa(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
- if (p->mm)
- P(mm->numa_scan_seq);
+ struct mm_struct *mm = READ_ONCE(p->mm);
+
+ if (mm)
+ __PS("mm->numa_scan_seq", mm->numa_scan_seq);
P(numa_pages_migrated);
P(numa_preferred_nid);
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 1:58 [PATCH v4 0/5] sched/debug: Introduce per-CPU debugfs files Aaron Tomlin
2026-08-10 1:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched/debug: Protect lockless rq->rd access in print_dl_rq() Aaron Tomlin
2026-08-10 6:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-10 13:53 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-08-10 1:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched/debug: Protect lockless rq->curr access in print_cpu() Aaron Tomlin
2026-08-10 1:58 ` Aaron Tomlin [this message]
2026-08-10 1:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched/fair: Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() in print_cfs_stats() Aaron Tomlin
2026-08-10 1:58 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched/debug: Introduce per-CPU debugfs files Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810015812.428999-4-atomlin@atomlin.com \
--to=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chjohnst@mail.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mproche@mail.com \
--cc=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sean@ashe.io \
--cc=steve@abita.co \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox