The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: "Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Matt Fleming <mfleming@cloudflare.com>,
	"Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] srcu: Make call_srcu() safe to call from any context
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:27:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810122758.183765-4-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810122758.183765-1-puranjay@kernel.org>

call_srcu() has the same constraint as call_rcu():
srcu_gp_start_if_needed() enqueues under raw_spin_lock_irqsave() and may
walk the srcu_node tree, as do callback invocation and grace-period work,
so a call_srcu() with interrupts already disabled can race an operation in
flight on this CPU.  call_rcu_tasks_trace() is call_srcu() under the hood,
so a sleepable BPF program freeing an object can reach this.

Defer as call_rcu() does: stage the callback on the srcu_data's
->defer_cbs, chain that srcu_data onto a per-CPU list, and raise a per-CPU
irq_work that re-issues it straight to the enqueue helper, never back
through __call_srcu().  The irqs-enabled path is unchanged; as for
call_rcu() the gate is bare irqs_disabled(), so callers that merely hold
interrupts off are deferred too and pay one irq_work hop, including
call_rcu_tasks_trace() from the BPF memalloc irq_work.

The irq_work is per-CPU rather than per-srcu_struct and statically
initialized, so deferral never runs check_init_srcu_struct(); it is
IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD as for call_rcu().  srcu_barrier() flushes it first, and
rcutree_migrate_callbacks() calls srcu_offline_drain() for an outgoing CPU.
cleanup_srcu_struct() drains before its "just leak it" early returns, and
srcu_module_going() before freeing any ->sda, since a staged srcu_data left
chained on a per-CPU list would dangle.  Staging is two steps, the callback
onto
->defer_cbs and then the srcu_data onto the per-CPU list, so a flusher can
find the per-CPU list empty while a callback whose call_srcu() has not
returned sits on ->defer_cbs; the staging CPU's own irq_work takes that
one.

The per-CPU srcu_defer ->lock, not any srcu_data's, is held with interrupts
off across the whole nested drain: the chain of srcu_datas staged on that
CPU and, for each, its callbacks, with srcu_do_enqueue() taking that
srcu_data's ->lock and possibly starting a grace period for every one.
That is what serializes the drainers.  The bound is as for call_rcu(): what
one interrupts-disabled region could stage, normally a single callback, or
whatever accumulates before the tick where arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() is
false.  Both lists are drained newest-first; nothing depends on call_srcu()
ordering.

The drain clears ->next before re-issuing, which bounds a node self-linked
by a double call_srcu(); a longer cycle is not bounded, and a double
call_srcu() stays undefined, as for call_rcu().

A callback deferred past the CPUHP_AP_SMPCFD_DYING irq_work flush leaves
that CPU's srcu_defer ->iw claimed with its self-IPI lost, as for
call_rcu().  srcu_offline_drain() still re-issues the callback, but the
irq_work cannot be un-queued, and here the claim is shared by every
srcu_struct on the CPU.

As in call_rcu(), the re-issue runs with interrupts disabled and can be
re-entered by instrumentation, so a per-CPU flag, set only while that CPU
is inside its own irq_work drain, drops a deferring call_srcu() seen
mid-drain unless it comes from an NMI.  Such a drop can strand state the
caller associated with the callback, not just the callback itself.

Staging records only the callback, so a deferred expedited call_srcu()
completes as a normal grace period.  Only srcu_expedite_current() can hit
that, and only when invoked with interrupts already disabled.

Gated by CONFIG_RCU_DEFER, though the srcu_data members and the per-CPU
srcu_defer are unconditional.  Under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, warn if the direct
path is reached from an NMI.

Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/srcutree.h |   4 +
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h         |   3 +
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c    | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        |   2 +
 4 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
index 75e54e4f963fa..1ce759fb70948 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/rcu_node_tree.h>
 #include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work_types.h>
+#include <linux/llist.h>
 
 struct srcu_node;
 struct srcu_struct;
@@ -41,6 +43,8 @@ struct srcu_data {
 	bool srcu_cblist_invoking;		/* Invoking these CBs? */
 	struct timer_list delay_work;		/* Delay for CB invoking */
 	struct work_struct work;		/* Context for CB invoking. */
+	struct llist_head defer_cbs;		/* Callbacks deferred on re-entry. */
+	struct llist_node defer_link;		/* Links onto the per-CPU deferral drain list */
 	struct rcu_head srcu_barrier_head;	/* For srcu_barrier() use. */
 	struct rcu_head srcu_ec_head;		/* For srcu_expedite_current() use. */
 	int srcu_ec_state;			/*  State for srcu_expedite_current(). */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index 91e33571a554d..d60444bf3a02d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -583,6 +583,9 @@ static inline bool should_rcu_defer(void)
 	       rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
 }
 
+/* Drain an outgoing CPU's deferred SRCU callbacks; see rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). */
+void srcu_offline_drain(int cpu);
+
 enum rcutorture_type {
 	RCU_FLAVOR,
 	RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 304112674e8a2..10c89f34920c8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/preempt.h>
 #include <linux/irq_work.h>
+#include <linux/llist.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
@@ -79,6 +80,38 @@ static void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
 static void srcu_irq_work(struct irq_work *work);
 static void srcu_delay_timer(struct timer_list *t);
 
+struct srcu_defer;
+static void srcu_defer_drain(struct irq_work *iw);
+static void __srcu_defer_drain(struct srcu_defer *sndp);
+
+/*
+ * Per-CPU call_srcu() deferral state, shared by every srcu_struct.  A deferred
+ * callback is staged on its srcu_data's ->defer_cbs; that srcu_data is chained
+ * via ->defer_link onto ->list, which the irq_work walks.
+ */
+struct srcu_defer {
+	struct llist_head	list;
+	struct irq_work		iw;
+	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
+	bool			draining;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_defer, srcu_defer) = {
+	.lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(srcu_defer.lock),
+	.iw = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(srcu_defer_drain),
+};
+
+/*
+ * Flush pending deferred callbacks so a following srcu_barrier() waits for them.
+ */
+static void srcu_defer_flush(void)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		__srcu_defer_drain(&per_cpu(srcu_defer, cpu));
+}
+
 /*
  * Initialize SRCU per-CPU data.  Note that statically allocated
  * srcu_struct structures might already have srcu_read_lock() and
@@ -107,6 +140,11 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_data(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 		sdp->cpu = cpu;
 		INIT_WORK(&sdp->work, srcu_invoke_callbacks);
 		timer_setup(&sdp->delay_work, srcu_delay_timer, 0);
+		/*
+		 * ->defer_cbs and ->defer_link are valid when zeroed and are not
+		 * reinitialized here: that would clobber callbacks a reentrant
+		 * call_srcu() already staged.  See __call_srcu().
+		 */
 		sdp->ssp = ssp;
 	}
 }
@@ -688,6 +726,14 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	unsigned long delay;
 	struct srcu_usage *sup = ssp->srcu_sup;
 
+	/*
+	 * Drain before the early returns below: they leak the srcu_struct, but
+	 * srcu_module_going() frees ->sda regardless, and a staged srcu_data
+	 * left chained on a per-CPU list would then dangle.  Draining first also
+	 * has to precede the ->irq_work sync, since re-issuing a callback can
+	 * start a grace period and re-queue ->irq_work, which schedules ->work.
+	 */
+	srcu_defer_flush();
 	raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup);
 	delay = srcu_get_delay(ssp);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup);
@@ -695,7 +741,6 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 		return; /* Just leak it! */
 	if (WARN_ON(srcu_readers_active(ssp)))
 		return; /* Just leak it! */
-	/* Wait for irq_work to finish first as it may queue a new work. */
 	irq_work_sync(&sup->irq_work);
 	flush_delayed_work(&sup->work);
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -1410,8 +1455,8 @@ static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
  * srcu_read_lock(), and srcu_read_unlock() that are all passed the same
  * srcu_struct structure.
  */
-static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
-			rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
+static void srcu_do_enqueue(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
+			    rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
 {
 	if (debug_rcu_head_queue(rhp)) {
 		/* Probable double call_srcu(), so leak the callback. */
@@ -1423,6 +1468,108 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 	(void)srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm);
 }
 
+/*
+ * The srcu_cblist and srcu_node tree are only accessed with interrupts
+ * disabled, so defer when interrupts are already off rather than enqueue into
+ * an operation that may be in flight on this CPU.
+ */
+static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
+			rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
+{
+	if (should_rcu_defer()) {
+		struct srcu_defer *sndp = this_cpu_ptr(&srcu_defer);
+		struct srcu_data *sdp;
+
+		/*
+		 * Instrumentation on the enqueue path can re-enter here from
+		 * inside the drain.  Re-queuing would livelock it, so drop the
+		 * callback; an NMI cannot loop, so let it through.
+		 */
+		if (READ_ONCE(sndp->draining) && !in_nmi()) {
+			WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU),
+				  "call_srcu() re-entered during callback drain; leaking callback\n");
+			return;
+		}
+		sdp = this_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
+		rhp->func = func;
+		if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)rhp, &sdp->defer_cbs)) {
+			/*
+			 * Chain this srcu_data for the drain.  ->ssp must be
+			 * published here: deferral skips
+			 * check_init_srcu_struct(), so on a never-initialized
+			 * static srcu_struct the srcu_data are still zeroed and
+			 * the drain would read a NULL ->ssp.
+			 */
+			sdp->ssp = ssp;
+			if (llist_add(&sdp->defer_link, &sndp->list))
+				irq_work_queue(&sndp->iw);
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Only reachable from an NMI when deferral is off: before the scheduler
+	 * is up, or with CONFIG_RCU_DEFER=n.  The enqueue can then race.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && in_nmi());
+
+	srcu_do_enqueue(ssp, rhp, func, do_norm);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Re-issue deferred callbacks straight to srcu_do_enqueue() so they cannot defer
+ * again.  ->lock serializes the drainers: the irq_work, srcu_defer_flush() and
+ * srcu_offline_drain().
+ */
+static void __srcu_defer_drain(struct srcu_defer *sndp)
+{
+	struct llist_node *snode, *snext;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_DEFER))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sndp->lock, flags);
+	llist_for_each_safe(snode, snext, llist_del_all(&sndp->list)) {
+		struct srcu_data *sdp = container_of(snode, struct srcu_data, defer_link);
+		struct srcu_struct *ssp = sdp->ssp;
+		struct llist_node *cnode, *cnext;
+
+		cnode = llist_del_all(&sdp->defer_cbs);
+		llist_for_each_safe(cnode, cnext, cnode) {
+			struct rcu_head *rhp = (struct rcu_head *)cnode;
+
+			/* Bounds a node self-linked by a double call_srcu(). */
+			rhp->next = NULL;
+			srcu_do_enqueue(ssp, rhp, rhp->func, true);
+		}
+	}
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sndp->lock, flags);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Only the irq_work drain can be re-fed by its own re-issue, so only it sets
+ * ->draining.  A direct drain re-issues onto this CPU, and anything staged
+ * during it is picked up by that CPU's own irq_work.
+ */
+static void srcu_defer_drain(struct irq_work *iw)
+{
+	struct srcu_defer *sndp = container_of(iw, struct srcu_defer, iw);
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(sndp->draining, true);
+	__srcu_defer_drain(sndp);
+	WRITE_ONCE(sndp->draining, false);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Drain @cpu's deferred call_srcu() callbacks once @cpu is dead.  One pass
+ * covers every srcu_struct; the re-issue lands on the current CPU.
+ */
+void srcu_offline_drain(int cpu)
+{
+	__srcu_defer_drain(&per_cpu(srcu_defer, cpu));
+}
+
 /**
  * call_srcu() - Queue a callback for invocation after an SRCU grace period
  * @ssp: srcu_struct in queue the callback
@@ -1677,9 +1824,18 @@ void srcu_barrier(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	int idx;
-	unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
+	unsigned long s;
 
 	check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
+
+	/*
+	 * Register any deferred callbacks before snapshotting the sequence.  The
+	 * staging list is per-CPU, not per-srcu_struct, so this also drains
+	 * other srcu_structs'.
+	 */
+	srcu_defer_flush();
+
+	s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
 	mutex_lock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
 	if (rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq, s)) {
 		smp_mb(); /* Force ordering following return. */
@@ -2134,6 +2290,12 @@ static void srcu_module_going(struct module *mod)
 	struct srcu_struct *ssp;
 	struct srcu_struct **sspp = mod->srcu_struct_ptrs;
 
+	/*
+	 * Deferral skips check_init_srcu_struct(), so cleanup_srcu_struct()
+	 * below can be skipped for an srcu_struct that has staged callbacks.
+	 * Drain them before any ->sda is freed.
+	 */
+	srcu_defer_flush();
 	for (i = 0; i < mod->num_srcu_structs; i++) {
 		ssp = *(sspp++);
 		if (!rcu_seq_state(smp_load_acquire(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed)) &&
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3bf3a250f9de8..7a9b18825e029 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4636,6 +4636,8 @@ void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu)
 	 * cover.  Drain them here, before the early returns.
 	 */
 	__rcu_defer_drain(rdp);
+	/* Likewise for the outgoing CPU's deferred call_srcu() callbacks. */
+	srcu_offline_drain(cpu);
 
 	if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
 		return;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 12:27 [PATCH v4 0/6] rcu,srcu: Make call_rcu()/call_srcu() safe from any context Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] rcu: Make call_rcu() safe to call " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:48     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] rcu: Make Tiny " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:45     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:27 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-08-10 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] srcu: Make Tiny call_srcu() " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] rcutorture: Exercise ->call() from NMI context Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-10 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add a call_srcu() re-entry reproducer Puranjay Mohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810122758.183765-4-puranjay@kernel.org \
    --to=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mfleming@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox