The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: moonafterrain@outlook.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	sd@queasysnail.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, danisjiang@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] macsec: check offload ops before inserting TX tag
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:50:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810215012.869528-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805-macsec-fixes-v1-1-634d7679a030@outlook.com>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
macsec: check offload ops before inserting TX tag

This commit fixes a NULL pointer dereference in macsec_insert_tx_tag().
When phy_detach() clears the lower device's phydev, macsec_get_ops()
returns NULL. This patch adds a check to safely drop the frame instead
of dereferencing the NULL ops pointer.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
> index ee0e2eb7dbc61..86c8009dcfa98 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
> @@ -3436,6 +3436,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *macsec_insert_tx_tag(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	int err;
>  
>  	ops = macsec_get_ops(macsec, &ctx);
> +	if (unlikely(!ops)) {
> +		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does macsec_insert_tx_tag()
still risk a NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free?

Further down in macsec_insert_tx_tag(), we re-read the phydev directly from
the real_dev without any synchronization:

drivers/net/macsec.c:macsec_insert_tx_tag() {
    ...
    phydev = macsec->real_dev->phydev;
    ...
    err = ops->mdo_insert_tx_tag(phydev, skb);
    ...
}

If phy_detach() runs concurrently and clears real_dev->phydev, couldn't this
pass a NULL or freed pointer to mdo_insert_tx_tag()?

Additionally, macsec_check_offload() and __macsec_get_ops() appear to perform
multiple unguarded reads of macsec->real_dev->phydev. Since
phy_device_release() frees the device directly rather than via RCU, could these
lockless dereferences lead to memory corruption, as the datapath's
rcu_read_lock_bh() doesn't protect the phy_device?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but doesn't the RX datapath have a similar
NULL pointer dereference?

Looking at handle_not_macsec(), if phy_detach() clears real_dev->phydev
concurrently, macsec_get_ops() can return NULL.

drivers/net/macsec.c:handle_not_macsec() {
    ...
    ops = macsec_get_ops(macsec, NULL);

    if (ops->rx_uses_md_dst && !is_macsec_md_dst)
        continue;
    ...
}

Since the returned ops pointer is immediately dereferenced without a check,
will this cause a crash when the PHY is detached?

>  	skb_final_len = skb->len - ETH_HLEN + ops->needed_headroom +
>  		ops->needed_tailroom;
>  	if (unlikely(skb_final_len > macsec->real_dev->mtu)) {
-- 
pw-bot: cr

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05  4:52 [PATCH net] macsec: check offload ops before inserting TX tag Junrui Luo via B4 Relay
2026-08-06 12:35 ` Antoine Tenart
2026-08-10 21:50 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810215012.869528-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox