From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: axelrasmussen@google.com, chenridong@xiaomi.com,
david@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kasong@tencent.com,
lianux.mm@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
stevensd@chromium.org, wangzicheng@honor.com, weixugc@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, zhangbo56@xiaomi.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, baoquan.he@linux.dev,
"Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 02/16] mm/mglru: improve scan_folios() exhaustion detection
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:16:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812121658.69965-3-baohua@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812121658.69965-1-baohua@kernel.org>
Commit 16b475d2ac3c ("mm/mglru: avoid reclaim type fall back when
isolation makes no progress") uses scanned == 0 to determine
whether scan_folios() has exhausted a reclaim type. However,
this is not always sufficient. It is possible for scanned > 0,
while the oldest reclaimable generation is exhausted after the
first scan_folios() call.
We detect early_stop in scan_folios(). If we stop early for any reason,
it means the current reclaim type is not exhausted yet. If early_stop is
never reached, it means we have exhausted the current oldest generation
without hitting any scanning limit.
Another issue is that if the lruvec has 4 generations, we might have
exhausted the oldest generation while the second oldest generation is
still reclaimable. In that case, this type is not exhausted yet.
Add an exhausted output argument to scan_folios() so it can
explicitly report whether the reclaimable lists for the current
type have been exhausted.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ea058692b9a5..0670a25d3a7e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4727,7 +4727,8 @@ static bool isolate_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct sca
static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct scan_control *sc, int type, int tier,
- struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp)
+ struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp,
+ bool *exhausted)
{
int i;
int gen;
@@ -4738,12 +4739,15 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
int skipped = 0;
unsigned long remaining = nr_to_scan;
struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
+ bool early_stop = false;
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_to_scan > MAX_LRU_BATCH);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(list));
- if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS)
+ if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS) {
+ *exhausted = true;
return 0;
+ }
gen = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->min_seq[type]);
@@ -4774,8 +4778,10 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
skipped_zone += delta;
}
- if (!--remaining || max(isolated, skipped_zone) >= MIN_LRU_BATCH)
+ if (!--remaining || max(isolated, skipped_zone) >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) {
+ early_stop = true;
break;
+ }
}
if (skipped_zone) {
@@ -4784,8 +4790,10 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
skipped += skipped_zone;
}
- if (!remaining || isolated >= MIN_LRU_BATCH)
+ if (!remaining || isolated >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) {
+ early_stop = true;
break;
+ }
}
item = PGSCAN_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc);
@@ -4796,6 +4804,13 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
scanned, skipped, isolated,
type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+ /*
+ * If we didn't stop early, all reclaimable folios in the current
+ * generation have been scanned. We are exhausted if this is the last
+ * reclaimable generation.
+ */
+ *exhausted = !early_stop &&
+ lrugen->min_seq[type] + MIN_NR_GENS == lrugen->max_seq;
*isolatedp = isolated;
return scanned;
}
@@ -4853,11 +4868,12 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
bool type_fallback_allowed = !is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness);
int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness);
int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier;
+ bool exhausted;
retry:
tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type);
scanned = scan_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc,
- type, tier, list, isolated);
+ type, tier, list, isolated, &exhausted);
total_scanned += scanned;
if (*isolated) {
@@ -4870,7 +4886,7 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
* We are running out of the current reclaim type. Fall back to
* the other type if allowed.
*/
- if (!scanned && type_fallback_allowed) {
+ if (exhausted && type_fallback_allowed) {
type = !type;
type_fallback_allowed = false;
goto retry;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 12:16 [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] mm: mglru: fix swappiness behavior Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/16] mm/mglru: improve readability of isolate_folios() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` Barry Song (Xiaomi) [this message]
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/16] mm/mglru: retry the same type once if isolation fails due to races Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/16] mm/mglru: boost swappiness responsiveness in get_type_to_scan() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/16] mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->nr_pages in inc_min_seq() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/16] mm/mglru: batch update lrugen->protected " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/16] mm/mglru: enhance cold/hot inversion handling " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/16] mm/mglru: exclude folios promoted by aging from protected " Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/16] mm/mglru: move folios from oldest gen to second-oldest gen from head to tail Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/16] mm/mglru: batch move folios to the second-oldest gen's LRU Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/16] mm/mglru: skip gentle reclaim at DEF_PRIORITY for extreme swappiness Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/16] mm/mglru: run aging if the preferred type has no reclaimable gens Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/16] mm/mglru: remove redundant gens <= MIN_NR_GENS check in should_run_aging() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/16] mm/mglru: run aging when pages are severely imbalanced across gens Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/16] mm/mglru: dynamically scale aging threshold in lru_gen_imbalanced() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-12 12:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/16] mm/mglru: reduce folios pulled from the oldest gen in inc_min_seq() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812121658.69965-3-baohua@kernel.org \
--to=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox