From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3B247D922; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 13:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786628486; cv=none; b=eOYHBg5Kf5+YW7ZODWPHnFPfTJa5GIGIZQIWclgzY71dBBuOGfzd0yIilkUAghI+j+mzJHYJk4H/gNol45NfGfEWiuSQ2MVOA9mRny7ncdpTymPvi9tbV2eCG/VTfE0D7P7uwLPzCI8uKD0Q/GcRKbH1vg+xS5H2rI99lU6LLQ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786628486; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yon+KGfNivKJFsOTncBwn6sFHMMNO+g0Af4R5xGN69g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=POFzceUg310XSGbg7Du5aXczsc3CscUg2WI2+OCDbUZ2kmG6WqACb/fykDGt8PJCjo8ZNoylvdxzLykZ42g4ic6XTQeiNjPZ4zizNFRrZ2WLIkau5qJDjsXqL8gzMBOtyqqEetYpDfUYSvXzwc5Pv1DdhJwCrmnjoA1hWszhlCo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=nWxBJNaL; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=JrOvAZHM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="nWxBJNaL"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="JrOvAZHM" Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:41:21 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1786628483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9DOLPzUdWUsoVLZgXHM9UfRkVwPB6i0v4UY/lMW8KeQ=; b=nWxBJNaLft/Sd2e8kKjoO3FMReIbMYC0KgCo74FXSs3i5JupX3ZMdOjxlE65ubJOeWm22o Qnys3wOGgwv+UhxnWowINSCzDitLHB2FJ2sFlC91WpDNSwEoOcH1cjP+hS5qNdmASqSVA1 3G66fsULdTZNvlnSm6RWtDbvO+bMHhUpnKyGUctdltnO77qmZzonD0ZDE+eCt+aqOjZCcW IqC4Ad76M+sN4BCl0OtolkJq9r/zjaSMLL+CdlfWna8Edu9G7Im7aXfg7jqiQe435dtiug w6eRtv+jsvIS6wDxvEqnwpBMGQzkLSJuE577tnjZe2BMIcs+RP+EDTzKZKSawQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1786628483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9DOLPzUdWUsoVLZgXHM9UfRkVwPB6i0v4UY/lMW8KeQ=; b=JrOvAZHMAEbGZdG5zm2g1OPreClRzYEe2WM/D8967A8jaL4oNPO8W+Oh8YwpvVt8erB0mo EYAihqNsSGkcDQAw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Bill Wendling , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , Justin Stitt , Nathan Chancellor , Neal Gompa , Nick Desaulniers , Richard Purdie , Sam James , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Tomas Glozar , Willy Tarreau , x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Start removing X86_X32_ABI Message-ID: <20260813134121.2vaFywr3@linutronix.de> References: <20260813-x32_removal-v3-0-e8f96cd15478@linutronix.de> <20260813-x32_removal-v3-2-e8f96cd15478@linutronix.de> <53d827d6481818bf0ba1fbf0b29aa5e750243b7b.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20260813121111.bVf9xHsk@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2026-08-13 14:24:39 [+0200], John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Adrian, > > The idea is to revert the (two) commit(s). > > But that imply that anyone concerned would have to respond in a timely manner > which is not really something I would expect. What do you mean by respond in a timely manner? > My suggestion would be to leave the complete x32 support fully intact until > the next LTS release so that anyone using that LTS release will know that x32 > will be fully working. Given the media covered it well, it might work. > Adrian Sebastian