From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: qce - Replace with stub driver
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:10:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813201019.GA987015@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d2706c6-79fa-40fc-a24a-6d5ffbf02330@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 03:09:36PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > SM8650 with the QCE is FIPS 140-2 certified and apparently this makes
> > a difference. Don't ask me if that makes sense, I don't claim to understand
> > the legal aspects of it.
>
> That sounds like the kind of thing that would cause someone to use
> a worse implementation of cryptographic algorithms 🙂.
>
> For what it is worth, many common uses of kernel cryptography can't
> use the QCE. This notably applies to the CSPRNG (/dev/urandom etc),
> storage encryption, and AF_ALG. Therefore, I expect that anyone who
> needs FIPS 140 compliance with Linux needs to ensure that the software
> crypto is certified, as that's what actually gets used in most cases.
Well there's that, and also the Inline Crypto Engine (which is actually
being used and is unrelated to QCE) has its own FIPS certification.
Which upstream kernel feature, if any, is QCE being used with? I have
asked this multiple times and still not gotten an answer.
Does the perceived value perhaps come merely from "offering" FIPS
certified cryptography on the system -- then not actually using it in
practice? That can maybe be understandable in some cases, but it's also
not really something that belongs upstream where actual technical merit
is expected. Also, could ICE be enough to check that checkbox?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 5:08 [PATCH] crypto: qce - Replace with stub driver Eric Biggers
2026-07-31 5:32 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-07-31 7:42 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-31 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-31 10:02 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-31 18:31 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-08-01 9:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-01 16:29 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-01 16:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-01 17:12 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-11 13:42 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-08-11 22:41 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-12 8:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-08-12 16:33 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-08-13 11:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-08-13 19:09 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-08-13 20:10 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-08-13 21:00 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-08-13 21:34 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-02 22:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813201019.GA987015@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=demiobenour@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuldeep.singh@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox