From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "David Finkel" <davidf@vimeo.com>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY
RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)),
linux-mm@kvack.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE
CONTROLLER (MEMCG)),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Tao Cui" <cuitao@kylinos.cn>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Ridong Chen" <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:29:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814012924.2388613-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
The memory.peak / memory.swap.peak per-fd watermark tracking has two
issues. Each open fd is a watcher and reads back max(its own value, the
shared local_watermark); both bugs live in that scheme.
Worst case for both is the same and is userspace-visible: a reader of
memory.peak (or memory.swap.peak) gets a value lower than the true peak,
so a tool that sizes or bills a cgroup by its peak usage under-reports it.
Patch 1 (read side) fixes the race Sashiko pointed out in the v1 review
[1]: peak_show() inspects local_watermark and the per-fd values without
holding peaks_lock, so a reader that races an unrelated peak_write()
reset briefly observes the lowered value. Transient. It takes peaks_lock
in the show path.
Patch 2 (write side) fixes peak_write(): on a reset it stores the
current usage into the other watchers instead of the old watermark, so
once usage has dropped from a peak a reset on one fd drags every other
fd's peak down too, even fds that never reset.
---
Changes since v2:
- Spell out the worst-case userspace-visible effect, per Andrew's
Go back to v1 [2].
Changes since v1:
- New patch 1: hold peaks_lock in the peak readers (Sashiko).
- Patch 2: floor the peers with max(usage, local_watermark), mirroring
peak_show(), and skip the writing fd (Johannes Weiner).
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730115314.1069089-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev?part=1
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260730115314.1069089-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev/
Ridong Chen (2):
memcg: acquire peaks_lock when reading memory.peak
mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
mm/memcontrol.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 1:29 Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-08-14 1:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] memcg: acquire peaks_lock when reading memory.peak Ridong Chen
2026-08-14 2:12 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-14 2:25 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-14 1:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814012924.2388613-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=davidf@vimeo.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox