The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
To: sgarzare@redhat.com
Cc: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:56:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814115612.127842-2-physicalmtea@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <an7KyotZ5vZOURu2@sgarzare-redhat>

> Will we do the same in vhost-net? If yes, all the callers will call
> vhost_init_device_iotlb() with dev.iotlb NULL, so should we remove
> that behaviour and add the check we are adding here inside the
> vhost_init_device_iotlb()?
>
> Or there is an use case where vhost_init_device_iotlb() is called with
> an already initialized dev.iotlb ?

I will check whether there is any valid use case for calling
vhost_init_device_iotlb() with an already initialized dev->iotlb. If
there is no such use case, I will move the check into
vhost_init_device_iotlb() and apply the same change to vhost-net as
well.

Thanks,
Jia

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14  7:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] vhost: add helper to clear device IOTLB Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:58   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:58   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates Jia Jia
2026-08-14  8:02   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14 11:56     ` Jia Jia [this message]
2026-08-14  7:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14 11:56   ` Jia Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814115612.127842-2-physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --to=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox