From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yugansh Mittal <mittalyugansh1@gmail.com>,
paul@paul-moore.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, omosnace@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Yugansh Mittal <mittalyugansh1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [V2] selinux: restore sleepable revalidation; keep fast no-sleep check
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 22:23:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202608152259.U1jKjeeX-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250826172330.44006-1-mittalyugansh1@gmail.com>
Hi Yugansh,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-selinux/next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.2-rc7 next-20260814]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yugansh-Mittal/selinux-restore-sleepable-revalidation-keep-fast-no-sleep-check/20260815-164746
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250826172330.44006-1-mittalyugansh1%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] [V2] selinux: restore sleepable revalidation; keep fast no-sleep check
config: alpha-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260815/202608152259.U1jKjeeX-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260815/202608152259.U1jKjeeX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608152259.U1jKjeeX-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
from include/linux/init.h:5,
from security/selinux/hooks.c:24:
security/selinux/hooks.c: In function '__inode_security_revalidate':
>> security/selinux/hooks.c:294:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_label_invalid' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
294 | if (likely(isec && !is_label_invalid(isec))) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:76:45: note: in definition of macro 'likely'
76 | # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
| ^
vim +/is_label_invalid +294 security/selinux/hooks.c
275
276 /*
277 * Try reloading inode security labels that have been marked as invalid. The
278 * @may_sleep parameter indicates when sleeping and thus reloading labels is
279 * allowed; when set to false, returns -ECHILD when the label is
280 * invalid. The @dentry parameter should be set to a dentry of the inode.
281 */
282 static int __inode_security_revalidate(struct inode *inode,
283 struct dentry *dentry,
284 bool may_sleep)
285 {
286 struct inode_security_struct *isec;
287
288 if (!selinux_initialized())
289 return 0;
290
291 /* Fast, non-blocking validity check first */
292 rcu_read_lock();
293 isec = selinux_inode(inode);
> 294 if (likely(isec && !is_label_invalid(isec))) {
295 rcu_read_unlock();
296 return 0; /* valid and no sleeping done */
297 }
298 rcu_read_unlock();
299
300 /*
301 * Label looks invalid. If we can't sleep, signal caller that a
302 * retry in a sleepable context is required. Only contexts like
303 * RCU path walk are expected to propagate -ECHILD.
304 */
305 if (!may_sleep)
306 return -ECHILD;
307
308 /*
309 * Sleepable context: reload the label. This may block.
310 * If @dentry is NULL and no dentry can be found we'll continue
311 * using the old label, consistent with prior behavior.
312 */
313 might_sleep();
314 inode_doinit_with_dentry(inode, dentry);
315 return 0;
316 }
317
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-24 13:01 [PATCH 2/2] selinux: make __inode_security_revalidate non-sleeping Yugansh Mittal
2025-08-25 12:47 ` Stephen Smalley
2025-08-26 17:23 ` [PATCH v2] [V2] selinux: restore sleepable revalidation; keep fast no-sleep check Yugansh Mittal
2025-08-26 20:08 ` Stephen Smalley
2026-08-15 14:23 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202608152259.U1jKjeeX-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mittalyugansh1@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox