linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Sven Peter <sven@kernel.org>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	asahi@lists.linux.dev, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] thunderbolt: Don't access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:09:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818060949.GV893316@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817-b4-tbt-fixes-v1-4-eded2461f5fc@kernel.org>

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Sven Peter wrote:
> tb_dp_dprx_work checks dprx_canceled before it takes tb->lock so it
> misses a tb_dp_dprx_stop that could not cancel the already running
> work. It then polls the DPRX capabilities and runs the callback for a
> tunnel that is being torn down and touches routers that may already be
> gone after an unplug.

Also here it would be good to describe how you reproduce this.

> 
> Check the flag with tb->lock held instead and check it again in
> tb_dp_tunnel_active because the callback runs after the lock has been
> dropped again.
> 
> Also clear the flag in tb_dp_dprx_start so that it only ever describes
> the work that is currently in flight.
> 
> Fixes: d6d458d42e1e ("thunderbolt: Handle DisplayPort tunnel activation asynchronously")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sven Peter <sven@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c     | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> index fb9da53fe391..e368a6b53f64 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> @@ -1910,6 +1910,18 @@ static void tb_dp_tunnel_active(struct tb_tunnel *tunnel, void *data)
>  	struct tb *tb = data;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tb->lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the DPRX read was canceled the tunnel is already being torn
> +	 * down by whoever canceled it. Do not touch the adapters here
> +	 * because the routers may be gone by now.
> +	 */
> +	if (tunnel->dprx_canceled) {
> +		tb_tunnel_dbg(tunnel, "DPRX read canceled, not activating\n");
> +		mutex_unlock(&tb->lock);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (tb_tunnel_is_active(tunnel)) {
>  		int consumed_up, consumed_down, ret;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c
> index 82d9c0b556dd..52fa90786ff8 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c
> @@ -1090,8 +1090,14 @@ static void tb_dp_dprx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct tb_tunnel *tunnel = container_of(work, typeof(*tunnel), dprx_work.work);
>  	struct tb *tb = tunnel->tb;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The DPRX read can be canceled while this work is waiting for
> +	 * tb->lock. Check the flag only once it is held: while the lock is
> +	 * held the tunnel cannot be torn down under us and the adapters are
> +	 * safe to access.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&tb->lock);
>  	if (!tunnel->dprx_canceled) {
> -		mutex_lock(&tb->lock);
>  		if (tb_dp_is_usb4(tunnel->src_port->sw) &&
>  		    tb_dp_wait_dprx(tunnel, TB_DPRX_WAIT_TIMEOUT)) {
>  			if (ktime_before(ktime_get(), tunnel->dprx_timeout)) {
> @@ -1103,8 +1109,8 @@ static void tb_dp_dprx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		} else {
>  			tb_tunnel_set_active(tunnel, true);
>  		}
> -		mutex_unlock(&tb->lock);
>  	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&tb->lock);
>  
>  	if (tunnel->callback)
>  		tunnel->callback(tunnel, tunnel->callback_data);
> @@ -1123,6 +1129,7 @@ static int tb_dp_dprx_start(struct tb_tunnel *tunnel)
>  		tb_domain_get(tunnel->tb);
>  
>  		tunnel->dprx_started = true;
> +		tunnel->dprx_canceled = false;
>  		tunnel->dprx_timeout = dprx_timeout_to_ktime(dprx_timeout);
>  		queue_delayed_work(tunnel->tb->wq, &tunnel->dprx_work, 0);
>  		return -EINPROGRESS;
> 
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-18  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17 19:53 [PATCH 0/5] thunderbolt: Fix DP tunnel teardown while an async DPRX read is running Sven Peter
2026-08-17 19:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] thunderbolt: Fix tunnel reference leak when the DPRX work is not started Sven Peter
2026-08-18  4:42   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-18  5:44     ` Sven Peter
2026-08-18  6:00       ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-18  6:11         ` Sven Peter
2026-08-18  6:19           ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-17 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] thunderbolt: Hold a switch reference for each path hop Sven Peter
2026-08-18  6:05   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] thunderbolt: Fix domain reference leak when DPRX read is canceled Sven Peter
2026-08-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] thunderbolt: Don't access a DP tunnel after its DPRX read was canceled Sven Peter
2026-08-18  6:09   ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2026-08-17 19:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] thunderbolt: Cancel the DPRX read when the domain is stopped Sven Peter
2026-08-18  6:17   ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260818060949.GV893316@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sven@kernel.org \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).