From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, david@kernel.org,
dev.jain@arm.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, liam@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
npache@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
hughd@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com, usama.arif@linux.dev,
joannelkoong@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
"Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] mm: batch lru_cache draining in deferred_split_scan
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:59:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818225904.55236-5-baohua@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818225904.55236-1-baohua@kernel.org>
deferred_split_scan() splits a batch of folios, so we only need to
drain the lru_cache once for the entire batch.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 263ef9b6949d..e797f6d1837e 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -4085,6 +4085,8 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
* @lock_at: a page within @folio to be left locked to caller
* @list: after-split folios will be put on it if non NULL
* @split_type: perform uniform split or not (non-uniform split)
+ * @lru_cache_drained: whether lru_cache has been drained locally
+ * or on all CPUs for a batch of folios
*
* It calls __split_unmapped_folio() to perform uniform and non-uniform split.
* It is in charge of checking whether the split is supported or not and
@@ -4100,7 +4102,8 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
*/
static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
struct page *split_at, struct page *lock_at,
- struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type)
+ struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type,
+ enum lru_cache_drained *lru_cache_drained)
{
XA_STATE(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index);
struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
@@ -4203,7 +4206,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
}
if (folio_ref_count(folio) == folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1 +
folio_may_be_lru_cached(folio))
- lru_cache_drain_for_folio(folio, 1, NULL);
+ lru_cache_drain_for_folio(folio, 1, lru_cache_drained);
/*
* Racy check if we can split the page, before unmap_folio() will
@@ -4395,7 +4398,7 @@ int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list
struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
return __folio_split(folio, new_order, &folio->page, page, list,
- SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM);
+ SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -4426,7 +4429,7 @@ int folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
struct page *split_at, struct list_head *list)
{
return __folio_split(folio, new_order, split_at, &folio->page, list,
- SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM);
+ SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -4622,6 +4625,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
struct folio *folio, *next;
int split = 0;
unsigned long isolated;
+ enum lru_cache_drained drained = LRU_CACHE_NOT_DRAINED;
isolated = list_lru_shrink_walk_irq(&deferred_split_lru, sc,
deferred_split_isolate, &dispose);
@@ -4646,7 +4650,8 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
}
if (!folio_trylock(folio))
goto requeue;
- if (!split_folio(folio)) {
+ if (!__folio_split(folio, 0, &folio->page, &folio->page, NULL,
+ SPLIT_TYPE_UNIFORM, &drained)) {
did_split = true;
if (underused)
count_vm_event(THP_UNDERUSED_SPLIT_PAGE);
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 22:59 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] mm: enable lru cache for smaller large folios Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-18 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] mm: allow smaller large folios to use lru_cache Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-18 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm: improve large folio reuse for LRU-cached folios Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-18 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] mm: drain LRU cache if necessary for splitting large folios Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-18 22:59 ` Barry Song (Xiaomi) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818225904.55236-5-baohua@kernel.org \
--to=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox