The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jimmy Zuber <jamz@amazon.com>
To: <miklos@szeredi.hu>, <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <jack@suse.com>,
	<joannelkoong@gmail.com>, <bfoster@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] fuse: zero the partial EOF page when extending a file
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:35:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820123533.190470-2-jamz@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820123533.190470-1-jamz@amazon.com>

Extending a fuse file past a non-page-aligned EOF does not zero the tail of
the old last page.  When that page is cached and has been mmap-dirtied beyond
the old EOF, the now in-bounds tail is served to later reads as stale data
rather than zeros, which violates POSIX file-extension semantics.

Some file systems get this zeroing automatically at writeback time
(block_write_full_folio() / iomap_writeback_handle_eof() zero the tail of the
folio straddling i_size).  A non-writeback caching fuse file system uses neither
path, so it has to zero the tail itself from the size-extending paths, like
XFS (xfs_file_write_zero_eof()) and ext4 (ext4_block_zero_eof()) do.
pagecache_isize_extended() cannot be reused: it is a no-op when
i_blocksize() >= PAGE_SIZE, and would increase the work in that function
for use cases that don't need it, if changed to support this situation.

Add fuse_zero_partial_eof_folio(), which zeroes the tail of the old EOF
folio, and call it up front from the three paths that extend a file,
mirroring xfs_file_write_zero_eof() and ext4_block_zero_eof():

  - a buffered write whose position is past the old EOF (fuse_perform_write(),
    before the page cache is filled);
  - a size-extending setattr/truncate (fuse_do_setattr());
  - a size-extending fallocate (fuse_file_fallocate()).

Zeroing [old EOF, write start) before the write, rather than after it, keeps
the zeroed range disjoint from the written data, so a write that lands inside
the old EOF folio is preserved without special-casing.

writeback_cache connections are unaffected, as their writes go through
iomap_file_buffered_write(), which zeroes post-EOF folios.  The bug is
observable on a non-writeback_cache server that returns FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE on
writable files (without FOPEN_DIRECT_IO), and is caught by the new
write_extend_eof fuse selftest.

Signed-off-by: Jimmy Zuber <jamz@amazon.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dir.c    |  3 +++
 fs/fuse/file.c   | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index 795e92037ce7..f6614ccef186 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -2282,6 +2282,9 @@ int fuse_do_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
 	 */
 	if ((is_truncate || !is_wb) &&
 	    S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && oldsize != outarg.attr.size) {
+		if (outarg.attr.size > oldsize)
+			fuse_zero_partial_eof_folio(inode, oldsize,
+						    outarg.attr.size);
 		truncate_pagecache(inode, outarg.attr.size);
 		invalidate_inode_pages2(mapping);
 	}
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index cb8da4c06d17..57630ad0af66 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
 #include <linux/splice.h>
 #include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
 #include <linux/iomap.h>
+#include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/rmap.h>
 
 static int fuse_send_open(struct fuse_mount *fm, u64 nodeid,
 			  unsigned int open_flags, int opcode,
@@ -1200,6 +1202,43 @@ static ssize_t fuse_send_write(struct fuse_io_args *ia, loff_t pos,
 	return err ?: ia->write.out.size;
 }
 
+/*
+ * A size-extending operation is about to turn [@from, @to) -- the range past a
+ * non-folio-aligned old EOF at @from -- into a hole that must read back as
+ * zero.  If the old last folio is cached and was dirtied beyond the old EOF
+ * (e.g. mmap stores into the post-EOF region, which are undefined until the
+ * file grows), zero that tail so it is not exposed as stale data instead of
+ * zeros (xfstests generic/363).  Only the folio straddling @from can hold such
+ * bytes, so a single folio is handled, as in pagecache_isize_extended().
+ *
+ * Callers hold i_rwsem, serialising this against concurrent writes and
+ * truncates; it must not run under fi->lock, as it locks the folio.
+ */
+void fuse_zero_partial_eof_folio(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t to)
+{
+	struct folio *folio;
+	size_t offset, end;
+
+	if (from >= to)
+		return;
+
+	folio = filemap_lock_folio(inode->i_mapping, from >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+	if (IS_ERR(folio))
+		return;
+
+	if (folio_mkclean(folio))
+		folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+
+	if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
+		offset = offset_in_folio(folio, from);
+		end = min_t(loff_t, to - folio_pos(folio), folio_size(folio));
+		folio_zero_segment(folio, offset, end);
+	}
+
+	folio_unlock(folio);
+	folio_put(folio);
+}
+
 bool fuse_write_update_attr(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, ssize_t written)
 {
 	struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
@@ -1368,9 +1407,19 @@ static ssize_t fuse_perform_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *ii)
 	struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
 	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
 	loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
+	loff_t old_size = i_size_read(inode);
 	int err = 0;
 	ssize_t res = 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * If the write starts past a non-aligned EOF, zero the old EOF folio's
+	 * tail before filling the page cache, so [old_size, pos) reads as the
+	 * hole it is.  The write below fills from @pos, disjoint from this
+	 * range.
+	 */
+	if (pos > old_size)
+		fuse_zero_partial_eof_folio(inode, old_size, pos);
+
 	if (inode->i_size < pos + iov_iter_count(ii))
 		set_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
 
@@ -2913,6 +2962,13 @@ static long fuse_file_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
 
 	/* we could have extended the file */
 	if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)) {
+		/*
+		 * fallocate writes no data, so the whole extension past the old
+		 * EOF is a hole; zero the old EOF folio's tail before publishing
+		 * the new size.
+		 */
+		fuse_zero_partial_eof_folio(inode, i_size_read(inode),
+					    offset + length);
 		if (fuse_write_update_attr(inode, offset + length, length))
 			file_update_time(file);
 	}
diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
index 85f738c53122..ee3b91b56fef 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
+++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
@@ -1183,6 +1183,7 @@ long fuse_ioctl_common(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 __poll_t fuse_file_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait);
 
 bool fuse_write_update_attr(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, ssize_t written);
+void fuse_zero_partial_eof_folio(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t to);
 
 int fuse_flush_times(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff);
 int fuse_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc);
-- 
2.50.1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 12:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] fuse: zero the partial EOF page when extending a file Jimmy Zuber
2026-08-20 12:35 ` Jimmy Zuber [this message]
2026-08-20 12:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/fuse: test post-EOF page zeroing when a file is extended Jimmy Zuber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260820123533.190470-2-jamz@amazon.com \
    --to=jamz@amazon.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox