From: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
To: tglx@kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, junan76@163.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, radu@rendec.net
Subject: [PATCH v3] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:47:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821024756.24927-2-junan76@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cxvdkhmn.ffs@fw13>
HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT is passed to hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(), whose
timeout argument is in milliseconds, not microseconds:
atomic_delay += HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US;
if (atomic_delay > to * 1000)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
So stm32mp_exti_set_type() asks for a 1 second timeout where the comment
next to the macro says it wants 1 millisecond. The semaphore is polled
with udelay() from a section that holds chip_data->rlock, a
raw_spinlock_t, so preemption stays disabled for the whole wait on every
configuration, PREEMPT_RT included.
The hwspinlock core documents this explicitly:
If the mode is HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC (called from an atomic context) the
timeout is handled with busy-waiting delays, hence shall not exceed
few msecs.
Fixes: 5257169ade8c ("irqchip/stm32-exti: Use the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API")
Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>
Signed-off-by: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
---
changelog:
v3: redefine the timeout macro with time unit on it
v2: add "Fixes" tag suggested by Radu Rendec
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260805032139.35420-2-junan76@163.com/
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
index a24f4f1a4..ce4e03ee1 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
-#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT 1000 /* usec */
+#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS 1
#define EXTI_EnCIDCFGR(n) (0x180 + (n) * 4)
#define EXTI_HWCFGR1 0x3f0
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static int stm32mp_exti_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
raw_spin_lock(&chip_data->rlock);
if (hwlock) {
- err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+ err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
if (err) {
pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, err);
goto unlock;
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 3:21 [PATCH] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout Ju Nan
2026-08-15 14:08 ` Radu Rendec
2026-08-15 14:19 ` Radu Rendec
2026-08-19 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-08-21 2:47 ` Ju Nan [this message]
2026-08-21 8:07 ` [Linux-stm32] [PATCH v3] " Antonio Borneo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821024756.24927-2-junan76@163.com \
--to=junan76@163.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox