From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA853AEF3E; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787553377; cv=none; b=mbfsiFedgGCZvWsK+9fsyQxnat6TYsNBaJyFhHRrJJjtUXSlifKVDKdR4T69OEZnuu8982Iy5GmYYXtmKHgMrMDWAhVlThijGqyyHqGkpj1tk+dQOM3F2TnrapMbuRx5qOc0bwPJQPW8pHg0zrp0/TDv8pQjjW5WXhUTgBildHI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787553377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JjT5CnkhEwXWKHCp5vcd75naMQ88yY8fBymV3FLZgIM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kfA4/5hNl5jReBLJ2MbGI8sUm7CUQqSbdWftzdRiTfmO/wFn4S7WS4Z5S4OX+H3uPpyvEq2eK+Y9+vbdNbZ6gVC+4C+GxXWlPbun3VhZM4C+tCKhypndFgW3aaK98SLGO3Tus6dBaR/2C9ZjfG9d8wD7Y2gX6V41oTUOC8ddBiA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Q1dcQ3e5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Q1dcQ3e5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02FCB1F00A3A; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:36:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1787553375; bh=U8VtGb2NKndAaPTn5SAVJTFXQN83mhgHX4TNHY4C+fM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Q1dcQ3e5meKm5O3ajEK+aHSkHZkkofm91E/qbuYhkiIpFcq3+4Lq5xqpY7V0ZWfiS QPhAIPCRBt4jfubDmuAfo8w8QgrqndU8Kd8aurIRTQiudzx9tM7yuhfdeZHiNxMCqs GTC/MSS6sKKUWarj84R88maPLFiol4zHo7fbMR5w= Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:34:34 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Chhabilal Dangal Cc: rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] driver core: power: Fix "sucessfully" typo in comment Message-ID: <2026082413-treason-krypton-b0b5@gregkh> References: <20260824061621.356483-1-yogeshdangal66@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260824061621.356483-1-yogeshdangal66@gmail.com> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 12:01:21PM +0545, Chhabilal Dangal wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chhabilal Dangal > --- > drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c > index 59bb37e82..3b8ba2780 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c > @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_clk_add); > * > * Add the clock to the list of clocks used for the power management of @dev. > * The power-management code will take control of the clock reference, so > - * callers should not call clk_put() on @clk after this function sucessfully > + * callers should not call clk_put() on @clk after this function successfully > * returned. > */ > int pm_clk_add_clk(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk) > -- > 2.55.0 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot