From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/kasan: Introduce helpers for lazy MMU mode sanitizer
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825100822.12095Cef-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4ea355b-9807-4a9d-8f90-246b4e650684-agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 09:50:30AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 11:56:35AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 02:01:30PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 12:11:34AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > Hi Alexander,
> > > >
> > > > Should all this be limited to only s390?
> > >
> > > The idea is to allow any architecture to opt-in. Once [1] is accepted
> > > this may look redundant, but I still see the benefit in having it.
> >
> > What would be the benefit if [1] is accepted?
>
> Just another mechanism for verification, and pretty cheap one.
> I would dare to say [1] does not rule out an invalid access completely.
Ok, maybe we should revisit this when we know how the solution for
page table accesses will be. Then hopefully it should be quite obvious
if this additional code is helpful or not.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 11:32 [PATCH v7 0/4] s390/mm: Batch PTE updates in lazy MMU mode Alexander Gordeev
2026-08-17 11:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] mm: Make lazy MMU mode context-aware Alexander Gordeev
2026-08-17 11:33 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] s390/mm: Batch PTE updates in lazy MMU mode Alexander Gordeev
2026-08-24 10:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-08-17 11:33 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/kasan: Introduce helpers for lazy MMU mode sanitizer Alexander Gordeev
2026-08-17 22:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2026-08-18 12:01 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-08-24 9:56 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-08-25 7:50 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-08-25 10:08 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-08-17 11:33 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] s390/mm: Lazy " Alexander Gordeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825100822.12095Cef-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox