From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: hartmnn.p@gmail.com
Cc: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, wens@kernel.org, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
samuel@sholland.org, andre.przywara@arm.com,
clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: reset the EMAC when opening, not when probing
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:41:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825124111.178799-1-pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260822045641.19282-1-hartmnn.p@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/
---
net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: reset the EMAC when opening, not when probing
The EMAC soft reset is moved out of sun8i_dwmac_probe() and into the
stmmac_dma_ops->reset hook, so it runs from stmmac_init_dma_engine()
instead of at probe time. A new helper sun8i_dwmac_soft_reset() holds the
assert-and-poll sequence, and sun8i_dwmac_reset() is kept as a thin
wrapper for the mdio-mux switch callback.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> index 48c52eb96233..748ebabd933c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> @@ -272,8 +272,34 @@ static const struct emac_variant emac_variant_h6 = {
> /* sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset() - reset the EMAC
> * Called from stmmac via stmmac_dma_ops->reset
> */
> +static int sun8i_dwmac_soft_reset(void __iomem *ioaddr)
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the existing header block now sits above the wrong
function. Neither statement in it holds for sun8i_dwmac_soft_reset():
the ops table binds .reset = sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset, and the new helper
has a second caller, sun8i_dwmac_reset(), used by the mdio-mux switch
callback. sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset() is then the only dma ops callback in
this file without a header comment naming it, unlike
sun8i_dwmac_dma_init() just below. Should the comment move down with the
function it describes?
> +{
> + u32 v;
> +
> + v = readl(ioaddr + EMAC_BASIC_CTL1);
> + writel(v | 0x01, ioaddr + EMAC_BASIC_CTL1);
> +
> + /* The timeout was previously set to 10ms, but some board (OrangePI0)
> + * need more if no cable plugged. 100ms seems OK
> + */
> + return readl_poll_timeout(ioaddr + EMAC_BASIC_CTL1, v,
> + !(v & 0x01), 100, 100000);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Is 100 ms still enough in the new context? The comment above the poll
was written for a probe-time reset, where the PHY had been powered and
clocking since boot.
In the new call site the PHY may have left BMCR_PDOWN only microseconds
earlier. __stmmac_open() and stmmac_resume() both do:
phylink_prepare_resume(priv->phylink);
...
ret = stmmac_hw_setup(dev);
and phylink_prepare_resume() itself says:
/* IEEE 802.3 22.2.4.1.5 allows PHYs to stop their receive clock
* when PDOWN is set. ... Note that 802.3 allows PHYs 500ms before
* the clock meets requirements. We do not implement this delay.
*/
if (pl->config->mac_requires_rxc && phydev && phydev->suspended)
phy_resume(phydev);
Only stmmac_reset_queues_param() and descriptor clearing sit between
phy_resume() and stmmac_init_dma_engine() -> sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset(), so
on a PHY that is slow to restart RXC after power-down the poll can expire
and stmmac_hw_setup() returns -ETIMEDOUT on ifup, MTU change and system
resume.
The other stmmac variants that soft-reset in this hook allow more
headroom: 200 ms in dwmac_lib.c, 1 s in dwmac4_lib.c and dwmac-imx.c, 2 s
in dwmac-loongson.c. Would raising the budget here be reasonable?
> static int sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset(void __iomem *ioaddr)
> {
> + int err;
> +
> + /* The MAC soft reset only completes once the PHY is driving the RX
> + * clock. Doing it here rather than at probe means phylib has already
> + * attached and resumed the PHY, so the clock is running by
> + * construction -- including after a warm reboot that left the PHY
> + * powered down.
> + */
[Severity: Medium]
Is the stated precondition accurate for all callers of the hook? The
commit message says:
"stmmac calls it from stmmac_init_dma_engine(), under stmmac_hw_setup(),
whose only two callers are __stmmac_open() and stmmac_resume() -- both
of which run after stmmac_init_phy() has attached and resumed the PHY."
stmmac_resume() does not call stmmac_init_phy() at all, and __stmmac_open()
is also reached from stmmac_change_mtu() and the XDP re-open path without
going through stmmac_open() -> stmmac_init_phy().
What actually guarantees a running receive clock before stmmac_hw_setup()
on those paths is phylink_prepare_resume(), added by commit 06232cb44bc8e
three weeks before this patch:
phylink_prepare_resume(priv->phylink);
stmmac_reset_queues_param(priv);
ret = stmmac_hw_setup(dev);
In the current tree the behaviour is fine, since stmmac sets
mac_requires_rxc unconditionally, so phylink_prepare_resume() does resume
a suspended PHY first. But the patch carries Fixes: 9f93ac8d4085 (2017).
In a stable tree without 06232cb44bc8e, would sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset()
assert SOFT_RST with an external PHY still in BMCR_PDOWN on every resume
and every MTU change, turning a probe-time failure into a resume and
MTU-change failure?
Could the commit message name phylink_prepare_resume() as the actual
dependency, and note it explicitly for backporters?
> + err = sun8i_dwmac_soft_reset(ioaddr);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> writel(0, ioaddr + EMAC_RX_CTL1);
> writel(0, ioaddr + EMAC_TX_CTL1);
> writel(0, ioaddr + EMAC_RX_FRM_FLT);
> @@ -740,23 +766,12 @@ static void sun8i_dwmac_flow_ctrl(struct mac_device_info *hw,
>
> static int sun8i_dwmac_reset(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> {
> - u32 v;
> - int err;
> -
> - v = readl(priv->ioaddr + EMAC_BASIC_CTL1);
> - writel(v | 0x01, priv->ioaddr + EMAC_BASIC_CTL1);
> + int err = sun8i_dwmac_soft_reset(priv->ioaddr);
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a problem introduced by this patch -- the mdio-mux reset call
site predates it -- but does the failure mode survive there for the
H3/V3s variants, the only ones with soc_has_internal_phy = true?
The commit message mentions the retained caller:
"sun8i_dwmac_reset() stays for the mdio-mux switch callback, which needs
a reset after changing the syscon and cannot use the hook."
That callback still runs at probe time. mdio_mux_read() invokes the
switch callback before forwarding the first MDIO transfer:
drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux.c:mdio_mux_read() {
...
r = pb->switch_fn(pb->current_child, cb->bus_number, pb->switch_data);
if (r)
goto out;
...
}
so during sun8i_dwmac_probe() -> sun8i_dwmac_register_mdio_mux() ->
mdio_mux_init() -> of_mdiobus_register(), the callback runs with
current_child == -1, selects the external child, unpowers the internal
PHY and calls sun8i_dwmac_reset() -> sun8i_dwmac_soft_reset() before
phylib has attached or resumed the external PHY.
On a board whose external PHY came back from a warm reboot in BMCR_PDOWN
-- the scenario in the commit message -- would the poll return -ETIMEDOUT,
switch_fn fail, mdio_mux_read() abort, and the external PHY never be
discovered?
The new comment in sun8i_dwmac_dma_reset() states that phylib has already
attached and resumed the PHY, which this second caller of the same helper
does not honour.
>
> - /* The timeout was previously set to 10ms, but some board (OrangePI0)
> - * need more if no cable plugged. 100ms seems OK
> - */
> - err = readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + EMAC_BASIC_CTL1, v,
> - !(v & 0x01), 100, 100000);
> -
> - if (err) {
> + if (err)
> dev_err(priv->device, "EMAC reset timeout\n");
> - return err;
> - }
> - return 0;
> +
> + return err;
> }
[ ... ]
--
This is an AI-generated review.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-22 4:56 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: reset the EMAC when opening, not when probing Pedro Santos
2026-08-25 12:41 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825124111.178799-1-pabeni@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hartmnn.p@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox