From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/12] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable()
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 16:31:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261114083124.1340140-9-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114083124.1340140-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Factor the local partition enablement out of
update_parent_effective_cpumask() into local_partition_enable(). It
computes the effective exclusive CPUs of the cpuset, validates them
with validate_local_partition() and then calls partition_enable() to
set up the partition, the same way as remote_partition_enable() does
for a remote partition.
As validate_local_partition() already rejects a root partition under an
isolated parent, the PERR_ISOPARENT check in update_prstate() is no
longer needed and is removed.
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 78ca3c39c029..45605c6ab6a2 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -2016,10 +2016,9 @@ static bool is_user_xcpus_exclusive(struct cpuset *cs)
* Important: The caller must ensure that @cs's cpu mask is updated before
* invoking this function when exclusive CPU validation is required.
*/
-static enum prs_errcode __maybe_unused
-validate_local_partition(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
- struct cpumask *excpus, bool excl_check,
- struct tmpmasks *tmp)
+static enum prs_errcode validate_local_partition(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
+ struct cpumask *excpus, bool excl_check,
+ struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
@@ -2044,6 +2043,47 @@ validate_local_partition(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
tmp ? tmp->delmask : NULL);
}
+/**
+ * local_partition_enable - Enable local partition for a cpuset
+ * @cs: Target cpuset to become a local partition root
+ * @new_prs: New partition root state to apply
+ * @tmp: Temporary masks for CPU calculations
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, error code on failure
+ */
+static int local_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs,
+ int new_prs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
+{
+ struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
+ enum prs_errcode err;
+
+ lockdep_assert_cpuset_lock_held();
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(is_remote_partition(cs)); /* For local partition only */
+
+ compute_excpus(cs, tmp->new_cpus);
+ err = validate_local_partition(cs, new_prs, tmp->new_cpus, false, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /*
+ * This function will only be called when all the preliminary
+ * checks have passed. At this point, the following condition
+ * should hold.
+ *
+ * (new effective_xcpus & cpu_active_mask) ⊆ parent->effective_cpus
+ *
+ * Warn if it is not the case.
+ */
+ cpumask_and(tmp->addmask, tmp->new_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(tmp->addmask, parent->effective_cpus));
+
+ partition_enable(cs, parent, new_prs, tmp->new_cpus);
+
+ cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(parent, tmp->addmask);
+ update_sibling_cpumasks(parent, cs, tmp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* update_parent_effective_cpumask - update effective_cpus mask of parent cpuset
* @cs: The cpuset that requests change in partition root state
@@ -2142,27 +2182,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
nocpu = tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, tmp->delmask);
}
- if ((cmd == partcmd_enable) || (cmd == partcmd_enablei)) {
- new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
-
- part_error = validate_partition(cs, parent, new_prs,
- tmp->delmask, NULL);
- if (part_error)
- return part_error;
-
- /*
- * This function will only be called when all the preliminary
- * checks have passed. At this point, the following condition
- * should hold.
- *
- * (cs->effective_xcpus & cpu_active_mask) ⊆ parent->effective_cpus
- *
- * Warn if it is not the case.
- */
- cpumask_and(tmp->new_cpus, tmp->delmask, cpu_active_mask);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(tmp->new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus));
- deleting = true;
- } else if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
+ if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
/*
* May need to add cpus back to parent's effective_cpus
* (and maybe removed from subpartitions_cpus/isolated_cpus)
@@ -3112,7 +3132,6 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
int err = PERR_NONE, old_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
struct tmpmasks tmpmask;
- int parent_prs = parent->partition_root_state;
bool isolcpus_updated = false;
bool disable_partition = false;
@@ -3155,18 +3174,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
* Otherwise, enable a remote partition.
*/
if (is_partition_valid(parent)) {
- enum partition_cmd cmd = (new_prs == PRS_ROOT)
- ? partcmd_enable : partcmd_enablei;
-
- /*
- * It is not allowed to create a root partition under
- * an isolated parent partition.
- */
- if ((new_prs == PRS_ROOT) && (parent_prs == PRS_ISOLATED)) {
- err = PERR_ISOPARENT;
- goto out;
- }
- err = update_parent_effective_cpumask(cs, cmd, NULL, &tmpmask);
+ err = local_partition_enable(cs, new_prs, &tmpmask);
} else {
err = remote_partition_enable(cs, new_prs, &tmpmask);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 8:31 [PATCH v5 00/12] cpuset: rework local partition logic Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] cpuset: introduce partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] cpuset: introduce partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] cpuset: introduce partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] cpuset: use partition_enable() for remote partition enablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] cpuset: use partition_disable() for remote partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] cpuset: use partition_update() for remote partition update Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] cpuset: introduce validate_local_partition() Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] cpuset: use partition_disable() for local partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] cpuset: use partition_disable() to invalidate local partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-14 8:31 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] cpuset: remove update_parent_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261114083124.1340140-9-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox