From: "Xu Xin (vivo)" <xu.xin@linux.dev>
To: xu.xin@linux.dev
Cc: chengming.zhou@linux.dev, david@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ljs@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/ksm: add initialization helpers for scan_get_next_rmap_item()
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 16:00:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115080049.132515-1-xu.xin@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261115075832.132109-1-xu.xin@linux.dev>
Extract the new scan cycle check into scan_should_start_new_cycle()
and add the helper scan_get_first_mm() that advances the scan
cursor to the first mm_slot.
This keeps the exact execution order intact while making
scan_get_next_rmap_item() cleaner and easier to follow.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Xu Xin (vivo) <xu.xin@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Rename scan_begin_new_cycle() to scan_should_start_new_cycle() and keep
it simple (David).
- Keep lru_add_drain_all() in scan_get_next_rmap_item() (David).
- Use scoped_guard(spinlock, &ksm_mmlist_lock) in scan_get_first_mm()
(Lorenzo).
- Keep Lorenzo's Reviewed-by tag as the changes are minor and follow the
suggested cleanups (please let me know if you prefer otherwise).
mm/ksm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 8db6743ece6d..337fcc9c6322 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -2638,6 +2638,34 @@ static void ksm_reset_unstable_trees(void)
root_unstable_tree[nid] = RB_ROOT;
}
+static bool scan_should_start_new_cycle(void)
+{
+ /* Check if the cursor points to the head. */
+ return ksm_scan.mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head;
+}
+
+static struct ksm_mm_slot *scan_get_first_mm(void)
+{
+ struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot = &ksm_mm_head;
+ struct mm_slot *slot;
+
+ scoped_guard(spinlock, &ksm_mmlist_lock) {
+ slot = list_entry(mm_slot->slot.mm_node.next,
+ struct mm_slot, mm_node);
+ mm_slot = mm_slot_entry(slot, struct ksm_mm_slot, slot);
+ ksm_scan.mm_slot = mm_slot;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Although we tested list_empty() above, a racing __ksm_exit
+ * of the last mm on the list may have removed it since then.
+ */
+ if (mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return mm_slot;
+}
+
static struct ksm_rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
{
struct mm_struct *mm;
@@ -2650,8 +2678,7 @@ static struct ksm_rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
if (list_empty(&ksm_mm_head.slot.mm_node))
return NULL;
- mm_slot = ksm_scan.mm_slot;
- if (mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head) {
+ if (scan_should_start_new_cycle()) {
advisor_start_scan();
trace_ksm_start_scan(ksm_scan.seqnr, ksm_rmap_items);
@@ -2670,17 +2697,8 @@ static struct ksm_rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
ksm_prune_migrate_nodes();
ksm_reset_unstable_trees();
- spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
- slot = list_entry(mm_slot->slot.mm_node.next,
- struct mm_slot, mm_node);
- mm_slot = mm_slot_entry(slot, struct ksm_mm_slot, slot);
- ksm_scan.mm_slot = mm_slot;
- spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
- /*
- * Although we tested list_empty() above, a racing __ksm_exit
- * of the last mm on the list may have removed it since then.
- */
- if (mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head)
+ mm_slot = scan_get_first_mm();
+ if (!mm_slot)
return NULL;
next_mm:
ksm_scan.address = 0;
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 7:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/ksm: clean up scan_get_next_rmap_item() initialization Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-15 8:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/ksm: extract helper functions for scan cycle cleanup Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-15 8:00 ` Xu Xin (vivo) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261115080049.132515-1-xu.xin@linux.dev \
--to=xu.xin@linux.dev \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox