From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:39:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:39:27 -0500 Received: from [172.16.18.67] ([172.16.18.67]:39555 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:39:08 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <200101162111.f0GLBNb14141@webber.adilger.net> In-Reply-To: <200101162111.f0GLBNb14141@webber.adilger.net> To: Andreas Dilger Cc: Venkatesh Ramamurthy , "'Bryan Henderson'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:38:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20276.979724327@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org adilger@turbolinux.com said: > One reason why this may NOT ever make it into the kernel is that I > know "kernel poking at devices" is really frowned upon. A possible alternative is to specify drives by serial number. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/