From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76932C282D7 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370402082C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727397AbfA3X4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:56:42 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:61865 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725811AbfA3X4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:56:42 -0500 Received: from 79.184.255.169.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.255.169) (HELO aspire.rjw.lan) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.183) id 628b1ba5fb41bf5f; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:56:39 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Lee Jones , Sinan Kaya Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, open list Subject: Re: [for next][PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fix unmet dependency warning for MFD_TPS68470 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:55:33 +0100 Message-ID: <2030742.Xi8Ns1LLnS@aspire.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190128072156.GE4678@dell> References: <20190121231958.28255-1-okaya@kernel.org> <20190128072156.GE4678@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, January 28, 2019 8:21:56 AM CET Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > On 1/24/2019 5:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Is anyone taking this or should I? > > > > Nobody replied to this yet. I was hoping this series to go through acpi > > tree like the rest of the other fixes. > > [post-vacation reply] > > That's not how these things are usually handled, but I taking into > consideration the trivialises of the patch, I don't really mind. > > Acked-by: Lee Jones I've applied this one, thanks!