From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-lkml@gmx.net>
To: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-lkml@gmx.net>
Cc: roland@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
drepper@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
michael.kerrisk@gmx.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] waitid system call
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:02:36 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20310.1092992556@www22.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 28571.1092981652@www22.gmx.net
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii", Size: 1269 bytes --]
Roland,
Just to follow up with one more data point.
> I did some more investigaton and testing:
>
> -- Tru64 5.1 behaves like Solaris 8 -- si_pid == 0 for
> the WNOHANG with no children case.
>
> -- HP-UX 11 is different -- not even POSIX compliant. It
> returns -1 with ECHILD in this scenario.
>
> -- According to the man pages, waitid() is also present on
> Irix 6.5 and UnixWare 7, but I don't have access to
> those systems to run a test (my earlier test program
> would be sufficient to test on those systems).
>
> So, discounting the non-compliant HP-UX, on other
> implementations we have 2 out of 2 for the "si_pid == 0"
> behavior. (I will see if I can get access to other
> systems for further testing.) So, how about
> reconsidering the approach for Linux?
Someone has supplied with me with a data point for Irix 6.5
(and 6.2). Irix behaves like Solaris 8. So that's 3 out
of 3 for the "si_pid == 0" behavior (plus a buggy HP-UX 11).
I will try to get a Unixware data point, but that will
probably take several days. (I wonder if anyone can supply
an AIX data point?)
Cheers,
Michael
Cheers,
Michael
--
NEU: Bis zu 10 GB Speicher für e-mails & Dateien!
1 GB bereits bei GMX FreeMail http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-20 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 23:03 [PATCH] waitid system call Roland McGrath
2004-08-16 5:40 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-16 17:15 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-16 21:12 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-19 17:20 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-19 20:53 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-20 6:00 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-20 9:02 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2004-08-20 20:04 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-24 11:51 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-31 6:04 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-31 6:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-31 6:37 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-31 6:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 15:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-08-31 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-31 23:51 ` Roland McGrath
2004-09-01 11:31 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-31 7:22 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-22 8:53 ` Tonnerre
[not found] <2tCiy-8pK-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-16 0:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-16 2:10 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20310.1092992556@www22.gmx.net \
--to=mtk-lkml@gmx.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.kerrisk@gmx.net \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox