public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/tty/serial: check the return value of uart_port_check()
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:09:25 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2033d06d-10a4-5a57-d650-7541c39990ee@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMEuxRqBEMdva3qEphvuYkFLpRjp=xg7vpqQT1oqb2AgkkG2+w@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 28 Aug 2022, Li Zhong wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:38 AM Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > uart_port_check() will return NULL pointer when state->uart_port is
> > > NULL. Check the return value before dereference it to avoid
> > > null-pointer-dereference error.
> >
> > Have you taken the locking into consideration?
> > If no, please do, if yes, expand your commit message to explain why
> > the current locking scheme doesn't prevent an error from happening.
> >
> 
> The locking is taken into consideration but these three checks do not need to
> unlock in error-handling because unlock() will be called in the callers. Will
> add the comment in v2 patch.

I think he meant you should indicate why the current locking doesn't cover 
the case you're fixing, not whether this function should call unlock() or 
not.

-- 
 i.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26  8:36 [PATCH v2] drivers/tty/serial: check the return value of uart_port_check() Li Zhong
2022-08-26 16:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-28 19:57   ` Li Zhong
2022-08-29  7:09     ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2022-08-30  6:59       ` Li Zhong
2022-08-30  7:20         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-03 23:14           ` Li Zhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2033d06d-10a4-5a57-d650-7541c39990ee@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=floridsleeves@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox