From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>,
ericvh@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net, asmadeus@codewreck.org,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, justin.he@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH RFC 0/4] 9p: fix open-unlink-f*syscall bug
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:19:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2037087.W39pGsgtbe@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914144325.7928dbd3@bahia.lan>
On Montag, 14. September 2020 14:43:25 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > So yes, looks like this also requires changes to the 9pfs 'local' fs
> > driver on QEMU side:
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg07586.html
> >
> > Eric, Greg, would there be an easy way to establish QEMU test cases
> > running
> > the 9pfs 'local' fs driver? Right now we only have 9pfs qtest cases for
> > QEMU which can only use the 'synth' driver, which is not helpful for such
> > kind of issues.
>
> I guess it's possible to introduce new qtests that start QEMU with
> -fsdev local instead of -fsdev synth... I haven't looked in a while
> though, so I won't comment on "easy way" ;-)
Makes sense, and I considered that approach as well.
The question is the following: is there a QEMU policy about test cases that
create/write/read/delete *real* files? I.e. should those test files be written
to a certain location, and are there measures of sandboxing required?
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 3:37 [PATCH RFC 0/4] 9p: fix open-unlink-f*syscall bug Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 3:37 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] fs/9p: fix create-unlink-getattr idiom Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 6:00 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-09-14 8:11 ` Greg Kurz
2020-09-14 3:37 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] fs/9p: track open fids Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 3:37 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] fs/9p: search open fids first Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 3:37 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] 9p: fix race issue in fid contention Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 5:55 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-09-14 6:31 ` [V9fs-developer] " Dominique Martinet
2020-09-14 7:50 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 7:32 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 8:32 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-09-14 12:34 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-09-18 8:57 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-09-18 9:34 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-09-18 10:05 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-09-14 8:35 ` [V9fs-developer] [PATCH RFC 0/4] 9p: fix open-unlink-f*syscall bug Greg Kurz
2020-09-14 11:06 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-14 12:43 ` Greg Kurz
2020-09-14 15:19 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2020-09-14 15:46 ` Greg Kurz
2020-09-16 12:16 ` Greg Kurz
2020-09-17 10:07 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-14 12:36 ` Jianyong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2037087.W39pGsgtbe@silver \
--to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox