public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: naresh kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	the hoang0709 <the_hoang0709@yahoo.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrubis@suse.cz,
	alexey kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Linux-next-20190823: x86_64/i386: prot_hsymlinks.c:325: Failed to run cmd: useradd hsym
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:12:52 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2039173876.8300255.1566861172742.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcd20866bb836d45b1e384dd68080c671bcde938.camel@hammerspace.com>


----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 10:38 -0400, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hi Jan and Cyril,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 16:35, Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > Do you see this LTP prot_hsymlinks failure on linux next
> > > > > > 20190823 on
> > > > > > x86_64 and i386 devices?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > test output log,
> > > > > > useradd: failure while writing changes to /etc/passwd
> > > > > > useradd: /home/hsym was created, but could not be removed
> > > > > 
> > > > > This looks like an unrelated problem, failure to write to
> > > > > /etc/passwd
> > > > > probably means that filesystem is full or some problem happend
> > > > > and how
> > > > > is remounted RO.
> > > > 
> > > > In Naresh' example, root is on NFS:
> > > >   root=/dev/nfs rw
> > > >  
> > > > nfsroot=10.66.16.123:/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/886412/extract-
> > > > nfsrootfs-tyuevoxm,tcp,hard,intr
> > > 
> > > Right !
> > > root is mounted on NFS.
> > > 
> > > > 10.66.16.123:/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/886412/extract-
> > > > nfsrootfs-tyuevoxm
> > > > on / type nfs
> > > > (rw,relatime,vers=2,rsize=4096,wsize=4096,namlen=255,hard,nolock,
> > > > proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=10.66.16.123,moun
> > > > tvers=1,mountproto=tcp,local_lock=all,addr=10.66.16.123)
> > > > devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs
> > > > (rw,relatime,size=3977640k,nr_inodes=994410,mode=755)
> > > > 
> 
> The only thing I can think of that might cause an EIO on NFSv2 would be
> this patch
> http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=trondmy/linux-nfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=627d48e597ec5993c4abb3b81dc75e554a07c7c0
> assuming that a bind-related error is leaking through.
> 
> I'd suggest something like the following to fix it up:

No change with that patch,
but following one fixes it for me:

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
index 20b3717cd7ca..56cefa0ab804 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static void nfs_pgio_rpcsetup(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
        }
 
        hdr->res.fattr   = &hdr->fattr;
-       hdr->res.count   = 0;
+       hdr->res.count   = count;
        hdr->res.eof     = 0;
        hdr->res.verf    = &hdr->verf;
        nfs_fattr_init(&hdr->fattr);

which is functionally revert of "NFS: Fix initialisation of I/O result struct in nfs_pgio_rpcsetup".

This hunk caught my eye, could res.eof == 0 explain those I/O errors?
                /* Emulate the eof flag, which isn't normally needed in NFSv2                                                                                 
                 * as it is guaranteed to always return the file attributes                                                                                   
                 */                                                                                                                                           
                if (hdr->args.offset + hdr->res.count >= hdr->res.fattr->size)                                                                                
                        hdr->res.eof = 1; 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-26 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26  9:47 Linux-next-20190823: x86_64/i386: prot_hsymlinks.c:325: Failed to run cmd: useradd hsym Naresh Kamboju
2019-08-26 10:41 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-08-26 11:05   ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-26 13:50     ` Naresh Kamboju
2019-08-26 14:38       ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-26 15:58         ` Trond Myklebust
2019-08-26 23:12           ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-08-27  0:59             ` Trond Myklebust
2019-08-27 10:25               ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-27 12:58                 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-08-27 13:20                   ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-27  6:34             ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2039173876.8300255.1566861172742.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexey.kodanev@oracle.com \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=the_hoang0709@yahoo.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox