From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAFDC4363A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8992225F for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2503957AbgJUSPv (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:15:51 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:48360 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2409610AbgJUSPv (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:15:51 -0400 Received: from 89-77-60-66.dynamic.chello.pl (89.77.60.66) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.491) id c132fe0aa49c926b; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:15:48 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Julia Lawall Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Ingo Molnar , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Valentin Schneider , Gilles Muller , viresh.kumar@linaro.org, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: check for idle core Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:15:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20581608.8Dxr8OdOFj@kreacher> In-Reply-To: References: <1603211879-1064-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <20201021121950.GF2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 2:42:20 PM CEST Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:56:55PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > Prior to 5.8, my machine was using intel_pstate and had few background > > > tasks. Thus the problem wasn't visible in practice. Starting with 5.8 > > > the kernel decided that intel_cpufreq would be more appropriate, which > > > introduced kworkers every 0.004 seconds on all cores. > > > > That still doesn't make any sense. Are you running the legacy on-demand > > thing or something? > > > > Rafael, Srinivas, Viresh, how come it defaults to that? > > The relevant commits are 33aa46f252c7, and 39a188b88332 that fixes a small > bug. I have a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @ 2.10GHz that does not > have the HWP feature, even though the cores seemed to be able to change > their frequencies at the hardware level. That's in the range of "turbo" P-states (if a P-state above a certain threshold is requested by the governor, the processor has a license to choose P-states in the range above this threshold by itself). Cheers!