From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Collabora Kernel Team <kernel@collabora.com>,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 0/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: add support for rk3588 variant
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:21:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2070639.PIDvDuAF1L@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175752285211.484319.18097786132863236205.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Hi Vinod,
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2025, 18:47:32 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Vinod Koul:
>
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2025 19:04:48 +0200, Michael Riesch wrote:
> > Habidere,
> >
> > The Rockchip RK3588 features two MIPI CSI-2 DPHYs (not to be confused with
> > the two combo MIPI DSI/CSI CPHY/DPHY blocks). The CSI-2 DPHYs can be
> > supported using the existing phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy driver, the notable
> > differences being
> > - the control bits in the GRF
> > - the additional reset line
> > This patch series adds support for this variant.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [2/7] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-inno-csi-dphy: make power-domains non-required
> commit: c254815b02673cc77a84103c4c0d6197bd90c0ef
> [3/7] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-inno-csi-dphy: add rk3588 variant
> commit: 5072b8e98eef4685a5a9a8bae56072cb65a2ef69
> [4/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: allow writes to grf register 0
> commit: 8c7c19466c854fa86b82d2148eaa9bf0e6531423
> [5/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: allow for different reset lines
> commit: 260435153c90c8e90553e456ec43578834a14a71
question, what happened to patch 6?
[PATCH v4 6/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: add support for rk3588 variant
or is it just missing from this mail?
Thanks
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 17:04 [PATCH v4 0/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: add support for rk3588 variant Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add rk3588 csidphy grf syscon Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-inno-csi-dphy: make power-domains non-required Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-inno-csi-dphy: add rk3588 variant Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-04 7:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: allow writes to grf register 0 Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: allow for different reset lines Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: add support for rk3588 variant Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-03 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: add mipi csi-2 dphy nodes to rk3588 Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2025-09-10 16:47 ` (subset) [PATCH v4 0/7] phy: rockchip: phy-rockchip-inno-csidphy: add support for rk3588 variant Vinod Koul
2025-09-10 19:21 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2025-09-11 4:36 ` Vinod Koul
2025-09-11 5:09 ` Vinod Koul
2025-09-11 9:05 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2070639.PIDvDuAF1L@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=didi.debian@cknow.org \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael.riesch@collabora.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox