From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Wade Mealing <wmealing@redhat.com>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@mork.no
Subject: Re: [RFC] Create an audit record of USB specific details
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:38:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2074584.b2h7oKljRp@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459875768.2892.1.camel@suse.com>
On Tuesday, April 05, 2016 07:02:48 PM Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 18:40 +1000, Wade Mealing wrote:
> > Consider the following scenario. Currently we have device drivers
> > that emit text via a printk request which is eventually picked up by
> > syslog like implementation (not the audit subsystem).
>
> We also have UEVENTs. The crucial question is why udevd feeding
> back events to the audit subsystem is inferior to the kernel
> itself generating audit events.
If this was going to be done in user space, then we are talking about auditd
growing the ability to monitor another netlink socket for events. The question
that decides if this is feasible is whether or not UEVENTS are protected from
loss if several occur in a short time before auditd can get around to reading
them.
The other issue that I'm curious about is if adding hardware can fail. Do the
events coming out by UEVENTS have any sense of pass or fail? Or are they all
implicitly successful?
And then we get to the issue of whether or not UEVENTS can be filtered. If so,
then we will also need to add auditing around the configuration of the filters
to see if anything is impacting the audit trail.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-04 4:02 [RFC] Create an audit record of USB specific details wmealing
2016-04-04 6:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-04-04 7:47 ` Bjørn Mork
2016-04-05 8:40 ` Wade Mealing
2016-04-05 11:49 ` EXT :Re: " Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
2016-04-05 13:46 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 13:52 ` Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
2016-04-05 15:35 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 14:40 ` Alan Stern
2016-04-05 22:17 ` Wade Mealing
2016-04-05 17:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-04-05 19:38 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2016-04-05 22:18 ` Greg KH
2016-04-04 12:56 ` Greg KH
2016-04-04 21:33 ` Steve Grubb
2016-04-04 21:48 ` Greg KH
2016-04-04 21:53 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 13:07 ` Burn Alting
2016-04-05 13:44 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 14:08 ` Burn Alting
2016-04-05 14:20 ` EXT :Re: " Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
2016-04-05 14:37 ` Burn Alting
2016-04-05 14:42 ` Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
2016-04-05 22:39 ` Burn Alting
2016-04-04 21:37 ` Paul Moore
2016-04-04 21:50 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 2:54 ` Paul Moore
2016-04-05 3:39 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 14:50 ` Paul Moore
2016-04-04 21:37 ` Steve Grubb
2016-04-04 21:54 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <CALJHwhR-SA7K=fD=DUXE7EFq+4gWKPaY+B5z6jdCj7180wg_vg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-05 1:54 ` Wade Mealing
2016-04-05 2:43 ` Greg KH
2016-04-05 2:47 ` Greg KH
2016-04-04 22:10 ` Burn Alting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2074584.b2h7oKljRp@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=wmealing@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox