From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: use PTP wide message type definitions
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:29:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2074851.ybSLjXPktx@n95hx1g2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201122143555.GA515025@shredder.lan>
On Sunday, 22 November 2020, 15:35:55 CET, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 09:26:35AM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> > Use recently introduced PTP wide defines instead of a driver internal
> > enumeration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de>
> > Cc: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
>
> But:
>
> 1. Checkpatch complains about:
> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Christian
> Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>' != 'Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers
> <ceggers@gmx.de>'
unfortunately I changed this after running checkpatch. My intention was to
separate my (private) weekend work from the patches I do while I'm on the job.
> 2. This series does not build, which fails the CI [1][2] and also
> required me to fetch the dependencies that are currently under review
> [3]. I believe it is generally discouraged to create dependencies
> between patch sets that are under review for exactly these reasons.
this was also not by intention. Vladimir found some files I missed in the
first series. As the whole first series had already been reviewed at that time,
I wasn't sure whether I am allowed to add further patches to it. Additionally
I didn't concern that although my local build is successful, I should wait
until the first series is applied...
> I don't know what are Jakub's preferences, but had this happened on our
> internal patchwork instance, I would just ask the author to submit
> another version with all the patches.
Please let me know how I shall proceed...
> Anyway, I added all six patches to our regression as we have some PTP
> tests. Will let you know tomorrow.
>
> Thanks
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201122082636.12451-1-ceggers@arri.de/T/#mc
> ef35858585d23b72b8f75450a51618d5c5d3260 [2]
> https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/389053/11923809/build_allmodconfig_
> warn/summary [3]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20201120084106.10046-1
> -ceggers@arri.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-22 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-22 8:26 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ptp: use common defines for PTP message types in further drivers Christian Eggers
2020-11-22 8:26 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: dp83640: use new PTP_MSGTYPE_SYNC define Christian Eggers
2020-11-22 8:26 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: use PTP wide message type definitions Christian Eggers
2020-11-22 14:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-11-22 19:29 ` Christian Eggers [this message]
2020-11-22 20:01 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-11-23 22:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-22 22:01 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-11-23 6:59 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-11-22 8:26 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: mscc: use new PTP_MSGTYPE_* defines Christian Eggers
2020-11-22 9:42 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-23 9:05 ` Antoine Tenart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2074851.ybSLjXPktx@n95hx1g2 \
--to=ceggers@arri.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=petrm@mellanox.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox