From: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable EEPROM_AT25 config option
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:24:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <207706e2-8fd4-748f-2ee7-3c372b447a7d@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMijByw1FYt42toNF6pAEykks_agetQybhgMQj8nAc6xdg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Olof,
On 16-10-17 02:58 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Scott Branden
> <scott.branden@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Enable support for on board SPI EEPROM by turning on
>> CONFIG_EEPROM_AT25. This needs to be on in order to
>> boot and test the kernel with a static rootfs image
>> that is not rebuilt everytime the kernel is rebuilt.
>
> If we did this for every kernel option we'd get a huge kernel.
>
> In general, we've said that static options for what's needed to boot
> to rootfs (i.e. storage and network drivers for nfsroot) are fine to
> enable statically.
>
> I doubt you need the EEPROM driver to boot to rootfs on your system,
> so please enable it as a module instead.
>
> Look into using config fragments in case you need to modify the
> options for local builds, it should be a convenient way to have a
> small delta to apply to fit your internal needs, instead of completely
> forking the config file.
Do you allow such config fragments to be upstreamed or do we need to
maintain these in our tree?
>
>
> -Olof
>
Thanks,
Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 18:51 [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable EEPROM_AT25 config option Scott Branden
2016-10-17 21:58 ` Olof Johansson
2016-10-17 23:24 ` Scott Branden [this message]
2016-10-18 0:04 ` Olof Johansson
2016-10-18 20:38 ` Scott Branden
2016-10-18 20:48 ` Olof Johansson
2016-10-18 22:23 ` Scott Branden
2016-10-19 8:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-19 16:50 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=207706e2-8fd4-748f-2ee7-3c372b447a7d@broadcom.com \
--to=scott.branden@broadcom.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox