From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755695AbaJ2ICH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:02:07 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:53072 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755306AbaJ2ICD (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:02:03 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Axel Lin Cc: Linus Walleij , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , arm@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: versatile: Add terminating entry for realview_soc_of_match Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:01:59 +0100 Message-ID: <2097592.uX1sdbECvl@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1413733260.6272.1.camel@phoenix> <2588271.FpfytU43Wu@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:p3dgC+/Av20YZGvUTISi8zz8lOuYLbciRo1tBErAaQT nozZrvykU2WMmEcPDZ0pxeEBRx3aXEZ2DcCLA3vacVSjDkyTzA 8bceb3uvY6/AQYIOCzUYUjAMB6pMOMqzhLDih1u7GsMkh8zX8z GGVaYEF7CaXusZ7h1rtvF3uMnVx5qGY/ngcE+UAdpwxZWJi2Lo SJ0k4nRfcK6bBCcIFJDZD/1uVrAtA5Wmqi9U0Ka+okfbF6zxhS ducUQmGIkXPhj8zuwj1FBl9CapwblUuD84kYFlyMIkTqZsJLK/ oomB4QUVFo5S/hCg0TF/h1TPdpdI9PkE/5rS87FjmFHuDqMIkO rpEmD2ceOWahgo9gVowI= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 29 October 2014 08:48:11 Axel Lin wrote: > >> > >> Arnd are you merging this directly into ARM SoC? > >> > > > > Applied to the fixes branch. > Thanks. > > > > Please remember to add arm@kernel.org when you want us to pick up the > > patches. > scripts/get_maintainer.pl does not suggest arm@kernel.org for this patch. > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl > 0001-soc-versatile-Add-terminating-entry-for-realview_soc.patch > Linus Walleij > (commit_signer:1/1=100%,authored:1/1=100%,added_lines:144/144=100%) > Arnd Bergmann (commit_signer:1/1=100%) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > Maybe it needs update the maintainer entry? We generally don't want developers other than subarch maintainers to send us stuff directly and we certainly don't want to be Cc'd on (literally, if you count every version in review) thousands of patches per kernel release. My comment was directed at Linus, who has sent us the updates for vexpress recently and who was (rightfully) asking for the patch to be picked up. Arnd