public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>,
	borisp@nvidia.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+29c22ea2d6b2c5fd2eae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tls: Fix slab-use-after-free in tls_encrypt_done
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:31:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20aed7c604115c7f346cdbbe848c37feded3cf21.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1P193MB0752428D259D066379242BD099D3A@VI1P193MB0752.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 19:02 +0800, Juntong Deng wrote:
> In the current implementation, ctx->async_wait.completion is completed
> after spin_lock_bh, which causes tls_sw_release_resources_tx to
> continue executing and return to tls_sk_proto_cleanup, then return
> to tls_sk_proto_close, and after that enter tls_sw_free_ctx_tx to kfree
> the entire struct tls_context (including ctx->encrypt_compl_lock).
> 
> Since ctx->encrypt_compl_lock has been freed, subsequent spin_unlock_bh
> will result in slab-use-after-free error. Due to SMP, even using
> spin_lock_bh does not prevent tls_sw_release_resources_tx from continuing
> on other CPUs. After tls_sw_release_resources_tx is woken up, there is no
> attempt to hold ctx->encrypt_compl_lock again, therefore everything
> described above is possible.
> 
> The fix is to put complete(&ctx->async_wait.completion) after
> spin_unlock_bh, making the release after the unlock. Since complete is
> only executed if pending is 0, which means this is the last record, there
> is no need to worry about race condition causing duplicate completes.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+29c22ea2d6b2c5fd2eae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=29c22ea2d6b2c5fd2eae
> Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>

Have you tested this patch vs the syzbot reproducer?

I think the following race is still present:

CPU0                            CPU1
tls_sw_release_resources_tx     tls_encrypt_done
spin_lock_bh
spin_unlock_bh
                                spin_lock_bh
                                spin_unlock_bh
                                complete

wait
// ...
tls_sk_proto_close

                                test_and_set_bit(BIT_TX_SCHEDULED, &ctx->tx_bitmask
				// UaF

regardless of 'complete()' being invoked before or after the
'spin_unlock_bh()'.

Paolo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-17 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12 11:02 [PATCH] net/tls: Fix slab-use-after-free in tls_encrypt_done Juntong Deng
2023-10-16  9:50 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-17 10:25   ` Juntong Deng
2023-10-17 10:31 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2023-10-17 11:49   ` Juntong Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20aed7c604115c7f346cdbbe848c37feded3cf21.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=juntong.deng@outlook.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+29c22ea2d6b2c5fd2eae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox